P.Arivazhagan v. D.Kavitha
Case brief
What is this about?
A civil miscellaneous second appeal was closed because the parties reported they have reunited and are living together, leaving nothing for further adjudication. No costs were awarded.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal was closed with no costs awarded because the parties have reunited and are living together.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.02.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
C.M.S.A.NO.12 OF 2014
P.Arivazhagan ... Appellant
Vs.
D.Kavitha ... Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil
Procedure Code read with Section 28 of Hindu Marriage Act against the fair
and decreetal order passed in C.M.A.No.40 of 2012 by the First Additional District / Sessions Judge, Cuddalore, confirming the fair and decreetal order passed in H.M.O.P.No.98 of 2009 dated 08.06.2012 on the file of Subordinate
Judge, Cuddalore.
For Appellant :
Ms.V.S.Usha Rani
Parties & counsel
- appellant
P.Arivazhagan
- respondent
D.Kavitha
Coram
M.Govindaraj
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court