Allowed

C.Krishnan v. the Managing Director

Madras HC20 Jan 2017WP(MD)/9782/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation to provide alternative employment to a driver declared unfit to drive heavy vehicles under Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, within two months.

What did the court decide?

Direct respondents to provide alternative employment with pay protection and re-credit of medical leave within two months.

C.Krishnan Vs the Managing Director — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.01.2017 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P(MD)No.9782 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.7740 and 7741 of 2016

C.Krishnan

... Petitioner

vs.

1)The Managing Director, The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Bye Pass Road, Madurai-625016.

¶7

2)The General Manager, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Dindigul Region, Bye Pass Road, Dindigul-624004.

¶8

3)The Dean, Government Medical College Hospital Theni, Madurai Main Road, Theni. ... Respondents

¶9

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1 and 2 Respondents to provide any alternative employment to the petitioner as per order of the 2^nd respondent dated 31.03.2016 under section 47 of Persons with Disabilities (Equal opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act 1995 with pay protection and other consequential benefits and to re-credit the Medical Leave for 60 days in terms of order of this Hon'ble Court in W.P(MD)No.20410 of 2015 and M.P(MD)No.1/2015 dated 18.11.2015.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Govindan For R1 & R2 : Mr.A.Jayaram

¶11

ORDER

¶12

The petitioner seeks a Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to provide alternative employment to him, as he is not fit to drive heavy vehicles and that he is entitled to alternative employment as per Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act 1995, with pay protection and other benefits.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

2.The petitioner submits that in similar circumstances, this

¶15

¶16

Court has granted the relief in W.P.No.20410/2015 dated 18.11.2015 in the case of one P.Rajesh.

¶17

3.Though the prayer in that writ petition is completely different from the present one on hand, the facts appear to be identical and the the petitioner/driver in that case was also found not fit for driving the heavy vehicles and after getting the medical certificate, he was referred to the Chief Medical Officer to get further opinion in the matter.

¶18

4.In this case, already the petitioner has been found unfit and that apart, the respondents cannot keep on referring the person who suffered with disability to one Medical Board or the other till such time they get a favourable report in their favour. The action of the respondents is deprecated and they shall provide alternative employment to the petitioner and extend the other benefits in terms of Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act 1995, and such exercise should be completed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶19

With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, W.M.P(MD)Nos.7740 and 7741 of 2016 are closed.

¶20

Sd/Assistant Registrar(Crl. Side) /True Copy/

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶22

To 1)The Managing Director, The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Bye Pass Road, Madurai-625016. 2)The General Manager, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Dindigul Region, Bye Pass Road, Dindigul-624004. 3)The Dean, Government Medical College Hospital Theni, Madurai Main Road, Theni.

¶23

+1cc to Mr.S.GOVINDAN, Advocate in SR. No.3352 NBI JS/CM/MSA/03.02.2017/2P-5C

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

W.P(MD)No.9782 of 2016 20.02.2017

C.Krishnan v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Krishnan v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Sri Balaji Traders Vs the Commercial Tax OFFICER-1

M/S.Sj Computers, Vs the Deputy Commercial Tax

S.Gopal, Special Grade Driver Vs the Tamil Nadu State

D.Saravanan Vs the Superintending Engineer

V. Muthuchamy Vs the Managing Director

M.Packiyam, Vs the Managing Director