Disposed

S.Gopal, Special Grade Driver v. the Tamil Nadu State

Madras HC19 Jan 2017WP(MD)/496/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Disposing of a writ petition for terminal retirement benefits, the Madurai Bench ordered the respondent to settle dues in twelve monthly installments with 6% annual interest (18% for defaults), allowing the petitioner to separately challenge the computation of benefits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to pay terminal benefits in twelve monthly installments; interest at 6% p.a. (18% for delay); separate justification for computation claims.

S.Gopal, Special Grade Driver Vs the Tamil… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 19.01.2017

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD)No.496 of 2017

¶6

S.Gopal ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

Tamil Nadu State Transport, Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director, Madurai. ... Respondent

¶9

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to directing the respondent to pay all the terminal benefits payable to the petitioner including Terminal Leave Salary together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of his retirement to till the date of payment within the time that may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr. A.Rahul For Respondent : Mr A.Jeyaraman

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

The petitioner was employed as Special Grade Driver in the respondents Corporation and he retired from service on 30.04.2012 on attaining the age of superannuation.

¶13

2.He has filed this writ petition seeking for a direction to the respondents to pay the retirement benefits.

¶14

3.The First Bench of this Court in similar matter has passed an order dated 12.06.2015 in W.A.(MD) Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, issuing direction to the transport Corporations to settle the terminal benefits of its employees in equal monthly instalments and to pay 6% interest on the terminal benefits payable to the workman. The Bench has also held that workman is entitled to 18% interest for the defaulted period of instalment.

¶15

4.In these circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:-

¶16

i)A direction is issued to the transport corporation to settle the terminal benefits of the petitioner that are yet to be settled, in twelve equal monthly instalments;

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ ii)The first instalment shall commence by making payment on or before the 10^th March 2017 and the amount in each of the remaining instalments shall be paid on or before 10^th of every succeeding

¶18

¶19

month;

¶20

iii) The said terminal amount shall carry interest @ 6% per annum, as per the Division Bench judgment referred to above. In case of delay in making instalments, the interest payable could be 18% for the delayed period;

¶21

iv) The aforesaid direction to settle the terminal benefits would not preclude the workman to question the computation of any of the terminal benefits, if the same is paid lesser than the amount to which, he is entitled to receive. Likewise, if the petitioner has any grievance that he is entitled to interest for the amount already settled, he can agitate the same as per law, if he is entitled. No costs.

¶22

19.01.2017

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Assistant Registrar(AE)

¶25

/True Copy/

¶26

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶27

+1 cc to Mr. A.RAHUL, Advocate, Sr.No:3333

¶28

rj2

¶29

MAS/PM-JN:30.01.2017:2P/2C

¶30

W.P.(MD)No.496 of 2017

¶31

19.01.2017

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Gopal, Special Grade Driver v. the Tamil Nadu State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Gopal, Special Grade Driver v. the Tamil Nadu State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Srinivasan Vs the Inspector of Police

N. Karpagam Vs the Inspector of Police

P.Krishnadoss, Vs the General Manager

M.Vimala Vs the Tamil Nadu Newsprint and

V.Kathiresan, Vs the Director

S.Deivam, S/O.Surulivel Vs the Motor Vehicle Inspector