Disposed

Karnan v. the Deputy Registrar of

Madras HC17 Mar 2017WP(MD)/4519/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court issued a direction to the respondents, specifically the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies and the President of Vamban Primary Agriculture Cooperative Credit Society, to consider the petitioner's representation dated 20.02.2017 in light of earlier conciliation proceedings.

What did the court decide?

The respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 20.02.2017 and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks from the date of receipt of the order.

Karnan Vs the Deputy Registrar of — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 17.03.2017

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR

¶6

W.P.(MD).No.4519 of 2017

Karnan

..Petitioner

Vs.

The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Aranthangi Circle, Pudukottai District.

¶11

The President, M.M.595, Vamban Primary Agriculture Cooperative Credit Society, Vamban Nalroad, Alangudi, Pudukottai District.

¶12

.. Respondents

¶13

PRAYER : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider petitioner's representation dated 20.02.2017 in the light of the proceedings of the Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation), Trichy in Na.Ka.No.A/039/2016, dated 18.04.2016 within a stipulated time as may be fixed by this Court.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sridharan

¶15

For Respondents : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthaiah, Government Advocate.

¶16

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

This Writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider petitioner's representation dated 20.02.2017 in the light of the proceedings of the Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation), Trichy in Na.Ka.No.A/039/2016, dated 18.04.2016 within the stipulated time.

¶19

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.

¶20

Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthaiah, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the Writ petition itself is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ taken up for final disposal.

¶21

¶22

Having regard to the limited scope of the prayer in the Writ

¶23

petition, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court is inclined to issue the following direction:-

¶24

“The respondents are directed to consider the representation of

¶25

the petitioner, dated 20.02.2017, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”

¶26

Accordingly, the Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶27

Sd/-

¶28

Assistant Registrar(Records)

¶29

/True Copy/

¶30

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶31

¶32

The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Aranthangi Circle, Pudukottai District.

¶33

The President,

¶34

M.M.595 Vamban Primary Agriculture Cooperative Credit Society, VambanNalroad, Alangudi, Pudukottai District.

¶35

+1 CC TO M/S.M.SRIDHARAN,ADVOCATE,SR NO.15612

¶36

pmu

¶37

MAS/RR:03.04.2017:2P-4C

¶38

ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD).No.4519 of 2017 17.03.2017

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶40

¶41

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Karnan v. the Deputy Registrar of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karnan v. the Deputy Registrar of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Corporate Manager, Vs the Director of School

P.Sivakumar, Vs G.Chakkaravarthy

R.N.Kamatchi, Vs the Director of Medical

S. David Raja, Vs the Management of State

The South Indian Bank Ltd., Vs the Deputy Commissioner of

S.Vasantha Kumari Vs the Principal Account General