2.The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner had been appointed as P.G. Assistant (Tamil) at the 6th respondent school on 15.11.2004 and he had joined at the 6th respondent school and working as such. When the petitioner has been working as P.G. Assistant pursuant to the appointment, during the year 2004 itself the third respondent had passed order dated 29.12.2004, by which certain posts both teaching and non teaching were treated as excess and accordingly one post of Tamil out of two P.G. Assistant (Tamil) has been shown as excess. Thereafter, the third respondent passed order dated 25.11.2005, whereby among other posts one post of Tamil was shown as surplus. Subsequently, on 23.03.2006, the third respondent has passed similar order showing one post of P.G. Assistant (Tamil) as excess. As against those orders detailed objection and representation have been made by the 6th respondent school on 23.03.2006 to the Director of School Education through proper channel and in response to the said objections made by the 6th respondent school, the third respondent has once again passed order dated 30.06.2006, wherein one post of P.G. Assistant (Tamil) had been taken away from the surplus post. The said order of the third respondent taking one post of P.G. Assistant Tamil and other posts have been questioned by the 6th respondent by way of Writ Petition in W.P.(MD) No.5673 of 2006. In the said Writ Petition, this Court on 13.07.2006 passed an interim order in M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2006, whereby, the said order of the 3rd respondent, taking away posts from the 6th respondent school, which includes one post of P.G. Assistant (Tamil), has been stayed. The said writ petition was pending before this Court for some time. During the pendency of the writ petition, the said post of P.G. Assistant (Tamil) has got restored by the proceedings of the 3rd respondent dated 19.05.2010. Since the said post and other connected posts, which were originally taken away by the proceedings dated 30.06.2006, since had been restored by the subsequent proceedings dated 19.05.2010, the said writ petition W.P.(MD) No.5673 of 2006 was withdrawn by the 6th respondent herein, who is the petitioner in the said writ petition. The said writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn on 19.05.2011. In spite of these developments, even though the petitioner had been working as P.G. Assistant (Tamil) from the very date of her appointment i.e., from 15.11.2004, her appointment had not been approved by the third respondent. Therefore, the petitioner has approached this Court with the aforesaid prayer.
