Petitioner requested withdrawal of writ petition filed under Article 226 challenging notice for harmonic control surcharges; Court allowed withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Withdrawal of writ petition allowed; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.02.2017 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
W.P.(MD)No.19344 of 2015
FULFILL PACKS PVT. LTD. HTSC NO.301 NO.795/2 ANNAMARAJ NAGAR SANKARANKOVIL ROAD RAJAPALAYAM VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER D.VIJAYARAGHAVAN ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN NO.800 ANNA SALAI CHENNAI 002.
2.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER VIRUDHUNAGAR ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CIRCLE TANGEDCO VIRUDHUNAGAR.
3.CENTRAL ELECTRICITY AUTHORITY REP. BY ITS CHAIRPERSON 4TH FLOOR SEWA BHAWAN R.K.PURAM NEW DELHI 110 066.
4.TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
19A RUKMINI LAKSHMIPATHY SALAI(MARSHALLS ROAD) EGMORE CHENNAI 008. ... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the 2nd Respondents impugned notice bearing Lr.No.SE/VREDC/VDR/DFC/AO/Rev/AAO/HT/D.No.860/15 dated 10.09.2015 and quash the same as illegal arbitrary without the authority of law and against the provisions of the CEA (Technical Standards for Connectivity to the Grid) Regulations 2007 and consequently forbearing the 1st and 2nd Respondent from in any manner levying demanding and/or collecting surcharges for not providing the harmonic controls from the petitioner who is connected with 11 kv supply line.
For Petitioner :Mr.N.Sudalaimuthu For Respondents 1to2 :Mr.G.Kasinathadurai
ORDER
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has also circulated a letter dated 06.02.2017 to the Registry and also made an endorsement to that effect.
2
2.In view of the letter circulated to the Registry and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar(P&A) /TRUE COPY/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To 1.THE CHAIRMAN TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED NO.800 ANNA SALAI CHENNAI 002. 2.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER VIRUDHUNAGAR ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CIRCLE TANGEDCO VIRUDHUNAGAR. 3.THE CHAIRPERSON CENTRAL ELECTRICITY AUTHORITY 4TH FLOOR SEWA BHAWAN R.K.PURAM NEW DELHI 110 066. 4.THE SECRETARY TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION 19A RUKMINI LAKSHMIPATHY SALAI(MARSHALLS ROAD) EGMORE CHENNAI 008. +1 cc to Mr.G.Kasinathadurai, Advocate, SR.No:8230 rr sva/bs/23.02.2017/2p/6c
W.P.(MD)No.19344 of 2015 10.02.2017
Fulfill Packs Pvt. Ltd.
Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited
The Superintending Engineer, Virudhunagar
Central Electricity Authority
Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission
R. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
