A writ petition seeking mandamus to direct implementation of an order was dismissed by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court due to the efflux of time, deeming the case time-barred.
No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petition also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 20.03.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM
and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.AUTHINATHAN
W.P(MD)No.2816 of 2015 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015
Alagupandi
.. Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District.
2.Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai.
3.The Tahsildar, Virudhunagar District.
4.Paulraj .. Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to implement order of second respondent proceedings in Na.ka.A2/6538/2014 dated 15.12.2014 and give further direction not to issue the patta in the name of Rajakambalathar Community in S.No.14, Sri Vadakathiamman koil of Inam Reddiapatti, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Mariyappan For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.K.Guru, Additional Government Pleader.
For Respondent No.4 : Mr.G.Marimuthu
ORDER
[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J. ]
This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the third respondent to implement the order passed by the second respondent in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Na.ka.A2/6538/2014 dated 15.12.2014, by way of issuing a writ of mandamus.
2
4.In fine, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(C)
/TRUE COPY/
SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
smn
MAS/SV-MMS/SAR2:11.04.2017:2P-7C
ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.2816 of 2015 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015 20.03.2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ court can direct implementation of an impugned order considering the efflux of time.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Alagupandi
District Collector, Virudhunagar District
Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai
Tahsildar, Virudhunagar District
Paulraj
A.SELVAM
N.AUTHINATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
