The Madurai Bench directed the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representations dated 15.01.2017 and 28.01.2017 within four weeks and disposed of the writ petition by mandate without going into merits.
Direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representations and pass orders within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 17.02.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P.(MD) No.2718 of 2017
H.NAZAR AHAMAD
S/O. A.M. HASSAN NO. 3/31A KUYAVAR 1ST
STREET NAGAL NAGAR DINDIGUL- 3.
... Petitioner
-vs-
1.THE REGIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR
OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, OFFICE OF THE
REGIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OP. SOCIETIES,
COLLECTORATE COMPLEX, VELU NACHIYAR VALAGAM,
DINDIGUL-4.
2.THE CIRCLE DEPUTY REGISTRAR
OF CO-OP. SOCIETIES, STATE BANK COLONY,
NEHRUJI NAGAR, DINDIGUL.
3.THE COOPERATIVE SUB REGISTRAR,
(U/S 81 OF THE ENQUIRY OFFICER) REPRESENTED
BY R. CHANDRASEKARAN, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OP. SOCIETIES, MUSIRI.
4.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,
DINDIGUL CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK,
KOOTURAVU NAGAR DINDIGUL. ... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representations made by the petitioner dated 15.01.2017 and 28.01.2017 within the time limit stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Saravanan
For Respondents : Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss
Govt. Advocate for R1 to R3
Mr.D.Shanmugaraja Sethupathi for R4
O R D E R
Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss, Government Advocate, accepts notice for the respondents 1 to 3. Mr.D.Shanmugaraja Sethupathi accepts notice for the 4th respondent. By consent of both sides, the writ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.
2
2.The prayer sought for in the writ petition is innocuous in nature, as the petitioner seeks for a mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representations made by the petitioner dated 15.01.2017 and 28.01.2017 and to pass orders thereon.
4.In view of the said prayer made by the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits or the claim made by the petitioner, is inclined to give a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 15.01.2017 and 28.01.2017, on merits and in accordance with law and pass orders thereon, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-II)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, OFFICE OF THE
COLLECTORATE COMPLEX, VELU NACHIYAR VALAGAM, DINDIGUL-4.
OF CO-OP. SOCIETIES, STATE BANK COLONY, NEHRUJI NAGAR, DINDIGUL.
REGISTRAR OF CO-OP. SOCIETIES, MUSIRI.
DINDIGUL CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK,
KOOTURAVU NAGAR DINDIGUL.
+1cc to Mr.D.SHANMUGARAJA SETHUPATHI, Advocate Sr.No. 8996
+1cc to M/S THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SR.NO. 9216
RR
AE/RR/15.03.2017/2P/8C
W.P.(MD)No.2718 of 2017 17.02.2017
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents were directed to consider the petitioner's representations.
Whether the directions were issued within the stipulated time limit.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
H. Nazar Ahamad
The Regional Joint Registrar, Dindigul
The Circle Deputy Registrar, Dindigul
The Cooperative Sub Registrar, Musiri
The Managing Director, Dindigul Central Co-operative Bank
R. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
