Disposed

B.Arsath Abdulla v. the Joint Registrar of

Madras HC16 Feb 2017WP(MD)/2663/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court directed the Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societies, Dindigul, and other respondents to consider the petitioner's representation of 21.01.2017 and pass orders on merits within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.01.2017 and pass orders on merits within four weeks.

B.Arsath Abdulla Vs the Joint Registrar of — Cooperative Societies | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.02.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR

¶5

WP(MD) No.2663 of 2017

¶6

B.Arsath Abdulla .. Petitioner

¶7

¶8

1.The Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societies, Dindigul.

¶9

2.The Deputy Registrar of Co-Operative Societies, Dindigul.

¶10

3.The Enquiry Officer/Co-Operative Sub Registrar, Dindigul. .. Respondents

¶11

Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 21.01.2017.

¶12

For Petitioner :Mr.M.Sheik Abdullah For Respondents :Mr.A.K.Baskara Pandian Special Government Pleader

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

The prayer in the writ petition is for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 21.01.2017 and pass orders thereon.

¶15

2.Mr.A.K.Bhaskarapandian, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. By consent of both sides this writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission.

¶16

3.Heard both sides.

¶17

4.Since the prayer sought for in this writ petition is innocuous in nature and as the petitioner seeks for a mandamus to direct the first respondent to consider and pass orders on the representation submitted by the petitioner, the first respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 21.01.2017, on merits and in accordance with law, and pass https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ orders within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

¶19

4.With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar(CS-I)

¶22

/True Copy/

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

¶25

1.The Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societies, Dindigul.

¶26

2.The Deputy Registrar of Co-Operative Societies, Dindigul.

¶27

3.The Enquiry Officer/Co-Operative Sub Registrar, Dindigul.

¶28

+1cc to Mr.m.Sheik Adbullah,Advocate,Sr No.8691 +1cc to Special Government Pleader,Sr No.8962

¶29

WP(MD) No.2663 of 2017 16.02.2017 pjl ms/rsk/17.2.2017/2p.6c

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

B.Arsath Abdulla v. the Joint Registrar of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Arsath Abdulla v. the Joint Registrar of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

L. Sankararaaj, Vs the Agricultural Production

D.P.Francy Diana Vs the Chief Engineer

C.Rengasamy, Vs the District Collector

Kannadasan, Vs the Director

T.S.Sathiamoorthi Vs the Joint Registrar of

S.Muthuvel, Vs the District Collector