Disposed

Thamarai Rajendra Kumar v. the Assistant Executive

Madras HC8 Feb 2017WP(MD)/2127/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This prescribed order disposes of a writ petition by directing the Tamilnadu Electricity Board officials to consider a petitioner's re-presentation application for a service connection regarding specific agricultural land and pass orders within three weeks, without expressing an opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's application for service connection and pass orders within three weeks.

Thamarai Rajendra Kumar Vs the Assistant Executive — Property and Title | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.02.2017

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P(MD)No.2127 of 2017

¶5

Thamarai Rajendra Kumar ... Petitioner

¶6

vs.

¶7

1)The Assistant Executive Engineer(North), Tamilnadu Electricity Board, TANGEDCO, Dindigul.

¶8

2)The Assistant Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, TANGEDCO, NGO Colony, Dindigul-624 005. ... Respondents

¶9

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, direct to the 2^nd respondent to restore the petitioner's application that was returned by the 2^nd respondent dated 19.10.2016 and give the service connection to me with regard to land in Seelapadi Village S.No.450/9A1 Dindigul Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Gomathi Sankar For Respondents : Mr.S.M.S.Johny Basha

¶11

ORDER

¶12

Though the prayer in this writ petition is for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2^nd respondent to restore the petitioner's application that was returned by the 2^nd respondent dated 19.10.2016 and give service connection in respect of the land in S.No.450/9A1, Seelapadi Village, Dindigul Taluk, Dindigul District, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that it is suffice, if a direction is issued to the 2^nd respondent to consider the application of the petitioner dated 19.10.2016 that was re-presented, seeking electricity connection and to pass orders, within a time frame.

¶13

2.In view of the limited relief sought for, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the application https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ of the petitioner dated 19.10.2016 that was re-presented, seeking electricity connection in respect of the land in S.No.450/9A1,

¶14

¶15

Seelapadi Village, Dindigul Taluk, Dindigul District, and to pass orders in accordance with law, if there are no legal impediments, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is open to the petitioner to submit copy of the application dated 19.10.2016, if required, along with necessary charges, if any. No costs.

¶16

Sd/-

¶17

Assistant Registrar[RTI]

¶18

/True copy/

¶19

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶20

To 1)The Assistant Executive Engineer(North), Tamilnadu Electricity Board, TANGEDCO, Dindigul.

¶21

2)The Assistant Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, TANGEDCO, NGO Colony, Dindigul-624 005. +1cc to Mr.G.Gomathishankar,Advocate,SR.6855 nbi KK-RSK-SAR.1-17.02.2017-2P-4C

¶22

W.P(MD)No.2127 of 2017

¶23

08.02.2017

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Thamarai Rajendra Kumar v. the Assistant Executive

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thamarai Rajendra Kumar v. the Assistant Executive

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thangapandi Vs the Inspector of Police

M. Rajasekar, Vs the Director of Elementary

Vanathi, Vs the Member Secretry

K.Kanthavel, Vs the Superintending Engineer

K.R.Jeyapandian Vs the Agricultural Production

G.Albert, S/O.Gabriel Vs the Managing Director