A petition for anticipatory bail was dismissed as withdrawn based on the endorsement made by the petitioner's counsel. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Seventh day of February Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN
CRL OP(MD) No.19 of 2017
THANGAPANDI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED - I
Vs
STATE REPRESENTED BY , THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NAGAMALAI PUDUKKOTTAI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT,
CRIME NO.577 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.T.SELVAM Advocate
For Respondent : MR.P.KANNITHEVAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
In view of the endorsement made by the counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
sd/07/02/2017
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECTUOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. Nbi
CSL/CM-MSA/SAR-I/17.02.2017 : 1P/3C
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.19 of 2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Date :07/02/2017
Thangapandi
State represented by The Inspector of Police Nagamalai Pudukkottai Police Station, Madurai District
S.Vaidyanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
