A writ petition challenging quarrying operations violating lease conditions was dismissed as infructuous by the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court without discussing the merits.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.07.2017 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
WP(MD)No.10967 of 2015 and MP(MD)No. 1 of 2015 and WMP(MD)No. 13195 of 2016
T.K.Seenivasan
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
2.The Deputy Director, O/o The Department of Geology and Mines, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
3.C.Jagadeesan
...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 & 2 to stop the quarrying operation within the 50 metres of both sides of the existing Sevalkulam and Kuruvikulam road, as per the lease conditions and to cancel the lease, done in contradiction of the conditions, in such case of the violations.
For Petitioner : Mr.F.X.Eugene For Respondents : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah, 1 & 2 Government Advocate For Respondent 3 : Mr.V.Sanjeevi
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer in this writ petition has become infructuous.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(Writs)
/True Copy/
Sub-Assistant Registrar
2
To
| 1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. |
|---|
| 2.The Deputy Director, O/o The Department of Geology and Mines, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. |
| +One cc to Mr.F.X.Eugene, Advocate, SR.No.64522 |
| +One cc to Mr.V.Sanjeevi, Advocate, SR.no.64051 |
| +One cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR.No.64454 |
| gk/smn RL/6C/2P/KP/SAR1/17/7/2017 |
| WP(MD)No.10967 of 2015 and MP(MD)No. 1 of 2015 and |
| WMP(MD)No. 13195 of 2016 07/07/2017 |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition claiming violation of quarrying lease conditions is maintainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T.K. Seenivasan
The District Collector, Tirunelveli District
The Deputy Director, O/o The Department of Geology and Mines
C. Jagadeesan
R. Mahadevan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court