Disposed

V.Chinnakalai, S/O.Vellaiyan, v. the District Collector

Madras HC6 Jul 2017WP(MD)/11729/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a Mandamus directing respondents to sanction financial assistance of Rs. 10,000/- under the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Social Security and Welfare Scheme for the petitioner's deceased wife. The Court directed the second respondent to consider the representation on merits within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.02.2016 on merits and pass orders within four weeks.

V.Chinnakalai, S/O.Vellaiyan, Vs the District… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.07.2017

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶5

W.P.(MD)No.11729 of 2017

¶6

V.Chinnakalai ...Petitioner

¶7

-Vs-

¶8

The District Collector, Collectorate, Sivagangai and District.

¶9

The Special Tashildar, (Social Security Scheme), Taluk Office, Singampunari, Sivagangai District. ...Respondents

¶10

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to sanction financial assistance of Rs.10,000/- under Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Social Security and Welfare Scheme by considering the petitioner's representation dated 15.02.2016 within a stipulated time by this Court.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sivalingam For Respondents : Mr.G.Muthukannan, Government Advocate

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to sanction Financial Assistance of Rs.10,000/- under Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Social Security and Welfare Scheme by considering the petitioner's representation dated 15.02.2016.

¶14

2.Heard Mr.R.Sivalingam, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.G.Muthu Kannan, learned Government Advocate https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ appearing for the respondents and perused the materials available on record.

¶15

¶16

3.The case of the petitioner is that his wife Ponnammal passed away on 23.06.2013. As per the scheme called Tamil Nadu Agricultural Labourers – Farmers (Social Security and Welfare) Act 2006, the petitioner is entitled for Rs.2,500/- towards Funeral Expenses and Rs.10,000/- towards Financial Assistance.

¶17

4.The grievance of the petitioner is that though the Special Tahsildar(Social Security Scheme) under the control of the District Collector, has disbursed Rs.2,500/-, but he was not paid the Financial Assistance of Rs.10,000/-. Hence the Writ petition.

¶18

5.Considering the case of the petitioner and prayer sought for in the Writ Petition, this Court directs the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 15.02.2016 on merits and in accordance with law and pass orders within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶19

6.With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar(Writs)

¶22

/True copy/

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

¶25

The District Collector, Collectorate, Sivagangai and District.

¶26

The Special Tashildar (Social Security Scheme), Singampunari, Sivagangai District.

¶27

+1 cc to Special Government Pleader in SR.No.63953

¶28

smi/msa

¶29

AE/MR KKR/SAR2/18.07.2017/2P/4C

¶30

W.P.(MD)No.11729 of 2017

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

06.07.2017

V.Chinnakalai, S/O.Vellaiyan, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Chinnakalai, S/O.Vellaiyan, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kalyani Vs the District Collector

Napoleon, S/O.Mariappan, Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

Salma Beevi Vs the Conservator of Forest

M.Neelavanan, Vs the District Collector

Vinoth Kumar Vs the District Collector

Peer Mydeen a. Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer