This was an order where the petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The connected miscellaneous petition was also dismissed.
The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated:20.07.2017
Coram
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL AND
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.P.No.8575 of 2010 and
M.P.No.1 of 2010
K.Eswara Raj .. Petitioner Vs. 1.M/s.Quippo Telecom Infrastructure Ltd., rep. By its Authorised Executive, S.Sirajudeen, Franchaisee of TATA Docomo D-2, 5th Floor, Sthr Park, Saket Place, ND – 110 017 & Circle Office at No.45, Damodharan Street, T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017.
2.The Chairman The Pollution Control Board, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. 3.Vimal Chand ..Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to immediately remove the base station/radiation tower that is put up on premises bearing Door No.9/5, Kandappa Achari Street, Purasawalkam, Chennai – 600 007.
For Petitioner : Mr.Inamdar Ameenur Rahman
[Order of the Court was made by M.VENUGOPAL, J.]
The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has made the following endorsement in the Writ Petition:
“The petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the W.P. with an observation in order to move the appropriate forum.”
2.Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ made, the Petitioner is permitted to approach the competent
forum, if so advised, in the manner known to Law and in accordance with Law.
3.Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Sgl
To
The Chairman
The Pollution Control Board,
Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.
+ 1 cc to Mrs. Rita Chandrasekar, Advocate SR.51120
+ 1 cc to Mr.Inamdar Ameenur, Advocate Sr.50758
W.P.No.8575 of 2010
CS-V
EU 29.08.17
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K. Eswara Raj
M/s. Quippo Telecom Infrastructure Ltd.
The Chairman The Pollution Control Board
Vimal Chand
M. Venugopal
P.D. Audikeshavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
