Petitioners filed a writ petition seeking direction to fix a fee structure for academicians. The petition was dismissed because the petitioners themselves represented that the prayer had become infructuous and was not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.07.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.P.No.27529 of 2003
and
W.P.M.P.Nos.33634 & 33635 of 2003
1.Dr.Geethalakshmi
2.Dr.G.Anuradha
3.Dr.E.Nandini
4.Dr.L.Natarajan
5.Dr.M.Devi
6.Dr.Herald J.Sherline
7.Dr.S.Thangakumaram ... Petitioners
Vs.
1. The State of Tamil Nadu,
Rep. By its Secretary to Government,
Health & Family Welfare Department,
Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
2. The Director,
Directorate of Medical Education,
Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.
3. Meenakshi Dental College & Hospital,
Rep. By its Dean,
Alapakkam Road, Maduravoyal,
Chennai – 602 102.
4. Ragaas Dental College,
Rep. By its Dean,
2/102, East Coast Road,
Uthandi, Chennai – 600 119.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Direction, directing the respondents to fix the fee structure for the merit listed petitioners for the academic years 200306 based on the recommendations issued in G.O.Ms.No.170 Health https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ and Family Welfare (MCA-1) Dept. dated 18.7.2003 and in
accordance with the clarification order dated 14.08.2003 rendered by the Hon'ble Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court clarifying the scope of T.M.A. Pai Foundation case as reported in 2002 (8) Scale 1.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Moorthy
For RR 1 & 2 : Mr.K.V.Dhanapal
Special Government Pleader
For R3 : No appearance
For R4 : Mr.Gobalapathi for
Mr.Muthumai Doraisami
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by M.VENUGOPAL, J.]
It is represented, on behalf of the Petitioner, that the
prayer sought for in the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
2.Recording the same and the endorsement so made to that
effect by the Petitioner side in the Writ Petition, the Writ
Petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. Consequently,
connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also dismissed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Sgl
To
1. The Secretary to Government,
State of Tamil Nadu,
Health & Family Welfare Department,
Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
2. The Director,
Directorate of Medical Education,
Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.
+1cc to Mr.K.Moorthy, Advocate, S.R.No.51648
W.P.No.27529 of 2003
PVS(CO) CA(05/09/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Dr. Geethalakshmi and Others
The State of Tamil Nadu
The Director, Directorate of Medical Education
Meenakshi Dental College and Hospital
Ragaas Dental College
Saveetha Dental College and Hospital
M. VENUGOPAL
P.D. AUDIKESAVALU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
