Dismissed

Lakshmi v. The Commissioner

Madras HC6 Apr 2017WP/8097/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single judge order dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus for a vending license. The court held that the Vending Committee was duly constituted and nominated the Chief Justice disposed of the writ petition directing the petitioner to approach the committee for the license. No costs were awarded.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of. The petitioner was directed to approach the Vending Committee for obtaining the license.

Lakshmi Vs The Commissioner — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 06.04.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

The HON'BLE MS.INDIRA BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

¶5

W.P.No.8097 of 2017

¶6

Lakshmi .. Petitioner
vs.
1 The Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai,
Rippon Buildings,
Chennai-600 003.
2 The Chairperson /
Zonal Executive Engineer Zone V,
(The Township Vending Committee)
Corporation of Chennai,
Chennai – 600 021. .. Respondents

¶7

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 02.03.2017 as per the provisions of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood Regulation) Act, 2014 made for granting permission / certificate of vending and till such time not to disturb with the running of the petitioner's bunk shop just opposite to Bus Stop, Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.L.Chandrakumar for M/s.R.Kamaraj For Respondents : Mr.A.Nagarajan

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

ORDER

¶11

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) In view of the Vending Committee having been constituted vide G.O. (4D) No.5, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (MCI) Department, dated 05.10.2016 and the proceedings of the Commissioner of Corporation in RDC.No.007/2016, dated 1.11.2016 nominating the members of the Vending Committee, we are not inclined to maintain the writ petition and it is for the petitioner to approach the Vending Committee for obtaining the license.

¶12

The writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. No
costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
bbr
To:
1 The Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai,
Rippon Buildings,
Chennai-600 003.
2 The Chairperson /
Zonal Executive Engineer Zone V,
(The Township Vending Committee)
Corporation of Chennai,
Chennai – 600 021.
+1cc to Mr.Kamaraj, Advocate, S.R.No.21231
+1cc to Mr.Nagarajan, Advocate, S.R.No.20821
SR(CO)
BMD(17/04/2017)
W.P.No.8097 of 2017

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Lakshmi v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lakshmi v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Y.H.Saifuddin Vs The Government of Tamilnadu

R.M.Balasubramanian, Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

Lenin Chander Vs The Secretary

Kala Vs The Commissioner

Devi Vs The Commissioner

Sakila Vs The Commissioner