Partly allowed

Lenin Chander v. The Secretary

Madras HC5 Apr 2017WP/7968/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking removal of illegal encroachment at Anna Bus Stand, West Tambaram. The Court directed the Municipal Commissioner to decide on the representation within 8 weeks after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.

What did the court decide?

Directed Respondent No.2 to decide on the petitioner's representation within 8 weeks, providing an opportunity of hearing.

Lenin Chander Vs The Secretary — Municipal and Town Planning | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 05.04.2017

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MS.INDIRA BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

¶7

W.P.No.7968 of 2017
Lenin Chander .. Petitioner
-vs-
1.The Secretary,
Department of Local Administration,
Fort St. George,
Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Municipal Commissioner,
Tambaram Municipality,
Tambaram,
Chennai-600 045.
3.The Deputy Collector,
Collectorate,
Kancheepuram District,
Kancheepuram.
4.Chandru
5.G.Mohan
6.Sahul Hameed
7.Sathish Kumar .. Respondents

¶8

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 06.3.2017 to remove the encroachment illegally encroached by the respondents 4 to 7 in the Municipal Complex, Anna Bus Stand, West Tambaram, Chennai – 600 045 in accordance with law within a period to be specified by this Hon'ble Court.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Venkatachalam For Respondents : Mr.T.N.Rajagopalan Spl. Government Pleader for respondents 1 & 3 Mr.P.Srinivas for 2^nd respondent * * * * *

¶11

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶12

After hearing the respective parties, we dispose of the writ petition by directing respondent No.2 to take a decision on the representation dated 06.03.2017 of the petitioner in accordance with law, after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, preferably within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of the communication of this order. No costs.

¶13

-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
bbr
To
1.The Secretary,
Department of Local Administration,
Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Municipal Commissioner,
Tambaram Municipality,
Tambaram, Chennai-600 045.
3.The Deputy Collector,
Collectorate, Kancheepuram District,
Kancheepuram.
+1 CC to Government Pleader, High Court, Chennai Sr.No.20563
+3 CC to Mr.K.Venkatachalam, Advocate Sr.No.21163
W.P.No.7968 of 2017
PA(CO)
KP(18/04/2017)

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Lenin Chander v. The Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lenin Chander v. The Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Sengottaiyan Vs Chellammal

C.K.Moidu Vs R.Sudhakar Babu

D. Chinnadurai Vs N. Duraisamy

M.Akhtar Basha, Vs The Commissioner

Y.H.Saifuddin Vs The Government of Tamilnadu

R.M.Balasubramanian, Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu