Dismissed

R.M.Balasubramanian, v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC5 Apr 2017WP/8044/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed under Article 226 to restrain officials from interfering with a building pending an appeal under the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act. The petition was withdrawn by the counsel, and the matter was dismissed accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition was also dismissed.

R.M.Balasubramanian, Vs The Government… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 05.04.2017

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

The Hon'ble Ms.INDIRA BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5

AND

¶6

The Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

¶7

W.P. No.8044 of 2017
and W.M.P.No.8796 of 2017
R.M.Balasubramanian .. Petitioner
-vs-
1.The Government of Tamilnadu,
Rep. by its Secretary,
Housing & Urban Development Dept.,
Secretariat, Fort St. George,
Chennai 600 009.
2.The Principal Chief Engineer,
The Greater Chennai Corporation,
Ripon Building, Chennai 600 003.
3.The Executive Engineer,
Zone-15, The Greater Chennai Corporation,
Rajiv Gandhi Salai (OMR),
Sholinganallur, Chennai 600 003.

¶8

4.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Division-192, Unit-44, Zone-15, Greater Chennai Corporation, Neelangarai, Chennai 600 115. .. Respondents

¶9

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus to forbear the 2^nd to 4^th respondents from in any way interfering with the building at Plot No.462, 8th Cross Street, Kapaleeswarar Nagar, South, Neelangarai, Chennai 600 115, particularly by way of Deoccupation notice and pending final determination of the appeal dated 27.03.2017 pending with the 1st respondent under Section 80A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.

¶10

For Petitioner : M/s.S.Meenakumari S. Saravanan for Mr.D.Balachandran

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition. An endorsement is also made.

¶16

2.Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, W.M.P.No.8756 of 2017 is also dismissed.

¶17

Sd/-
Asst.Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
sra
To
1.The Secretary to Govt. of Tamilnadu,
Housing & Urban Development Dept.,
Secretariat, Fort St. George,
Chennai 600 009.
2.The Principal Chief Engineer,
The Greater Chennai Corporation,
Ripon Building, Chennai 600 003.
3.The Executive Engineer,
Zone-15, The Greater Chennai Corporation,
Rajiv Gandhi Salai (OMR),
Sholinganallur, Chennai 600 003.
4.The Assistant Executive Engineer,
Division-192, Unit-44, Zone-15,
Greater Chennai Corporation,
Neelangarai, Chennai 600 115.
+1cc to Government Pleader sr.20561
+1cc to Mr.D.Balachandran,sr.20282
+1cc to Mr.A.Nagarajan,sr.20332

¶18

W.P.No.8044 of 2017

¶19

pvs(co) ss(19/4/2017)

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.M.Balasubramanian, v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.M.Balasubramanian, v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Sengottaiyan Vs Chellammal

C.K.Moidu Vs R.Sudhakar Babu

D. Chinnadurai Vs N. Duraisamy

M.Akhtar Basha, Vs The Commissioner

Y.H.Saifuddin Vs The Government of Tamilnadu

Lenin Chander Vs The Secretary