P.Asokan v. Director
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the present Writ Petition under Article 226 seeking a writ of mandamus for employment consideration. The High Court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the petition without costs.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
What the court decided
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 06.09.2017
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P. No.7913 of 2016
P.Asokan ...Petitioner
Vs
1. Director,
Medical and Rural Health Service,
Chennai-06.
2. Joint Director,
Office of the Medical and Rural Health Services,
Vellore, Vellore District.
3. Medical Officer,
Government Hospital,
Thirupattur,
Vellore District.
4. The Secretary to the Government,
Health and Family Welfare Department,
Fort Saint George, Chennai – 09. ...Respondents
Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 28.12.2015 through in person directing the 1st respondent to allow the petitioner to work in the hospital as worker in the 3rd respondent's hospital at Tirupattur, Vellore District.
For Petitioner : Mr.I.Abraham Engles
For Respondents : Mr.S.Gunasekaran
Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.Asokan
- respondent
Director, Medical and Rural Health Service, Chennai
- respondent
Joint Director, Office of the Medical and Rural Health Services, Vellore
- respondent
Medical Officer, Government Hospital, Thirupattur
- respondent
The Secretary to the Government, Health and Family Welfare Department
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court