Petitioner sought writ to quash revised fixed rent for housing. Subsequent payment rendered petition infructuous, leading to dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 21.08.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P.No.42762 of 2002
Geetha Sivaraman .. Petitioner
Vs.
Tamilnadu Housing Board Rep. by the Executive Engineer & Administrative Officer, Annanagar Division, TNHB II Avenue, Annanagar,Chennai – 40. .. Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records on the file of the respondent in connection with the order passed in letter no.P145040/1997 dated 23.09.2002 and quash the same.
For Respondent : Mr.Jayaseelan for TNHB
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has challenged the revised rent fixed by the respondent.
/true copy/
cgi/cla
To
Executive Engineer & Administrative Officer, Tamilnadu Housing Board Rep. Annanagar Division, TNHB II Avenue, Annanagar,Chennai – 40.
+1cc to Mr.M.Srividhya,Advocate sr.59718
W.P.No.42762 of 2002
ss(4/9/2017)
Geetha Sivaraman
Tamilnadu Housing Board
Abdul Quddose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
