Petitioner challenged a service termination order via writ. Counsel submitted the prayer was infructuous. The Court dismissed the petition on that ground without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.08.2017
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P.No.38391 of 2004
S.Indirani ... Petitioner
Vs
1. The Collector,
Perambalur,
Perambalur District.
2. The District Project Officer,
Perambalur,
Perambalur District. ... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call
for the records relating to the impugned order of the second
respondent in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.3939/A1/04, dated 2.12.2004 and
quash the same and direct the respondents to reinstate the
petitioner in service with all attendant benefits.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Manoj Kumar
For Respondents : Mr.K.Bala Murugan,
Government Advocate
ORDER
Mr.R.Suresh (Enrolment No.1002/2017), learned counsel representing Mr.P.Manoj Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on record has submitted that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Recording the submission and endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However there is no order as to costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
cla
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Indirani
The Collector, Perambalur
The District Project Officer, Perambalur
ABDUL QUDDHOSE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
