S.Umanath v. the State of Tamilnadu Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
Justice Abdul Quddhosse dismissed a writ petition by the petitioner before admission. Learned counsel for the petitioner did not appear before the Court.
Justice Abdul Quddhosse dismissed a writ petition by the petitioner before admission. Learned counsel for the petitioner did not appear before the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.08.2017
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P.No.24872 of 2004 and W.P.M.P.30226 of 2004
R.Saravanan
...Petitioner
vs.
1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
rep. by the Secretary to Government,
Personal & Administration Reforms Department,
Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Bharathiar University,
rep. by its Registrar,
Coimbatore – 641 046.
3.The Secretary,
SLET & Controller of Examinations,
Bharathiar University,
Coimbatore – 641 046. ...Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to III respondent's order dated 02.08.2004 in Ref.No.BU-COE/SLET/2004/Def-909/29118 and quash the same and direct the II and III respondents to recognise the Degree in M.P.E.S. of Annamalai University obtained by the petitioner and permit him to write the SLET 2004 exams.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Srinivas & Mythili Srinivas (No appearance)
For Respondent : Mr.K.Balamurugan(for R1) Government Advocate
For Respondent R2 & R3 : No appearance
ORDER
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. As recorded earlier on 28.07.2017, this Court has observed that the prayer sought for in the writ petition pertains to the year 2004. In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for permission to write the SLET Exam for the year 2004.
2.It is evident that nothing survives in the writ petition and further there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner once again.
3.In such circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed. Sd/Asst.Registrar (CS IV ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar To 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Secretary to Government, Personal & Administration Reforms Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Bharathiar University, rep. by its Registrar, Coimbatore – 641 046. 3.The Secretary, SLET & Controller of Examinations, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore – 641 046.
W.P.No.24872 of 2004 and W.P.M.P.30226 of 2004 ss(31/8/2017)
R.Saravanan
The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Secretary to Government, Personal & Administration Reforms Department
The Bharathiar University, rep. by its Registrar
The Secretary, SLET & Controller of Examinations, Bharathiar University
Abdul Quddhosse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court