Disposed

P.Annadurai v. District Collector

Madras HC14 Jun 2017WP/32966/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a writ directing the District Collector to act against the Village President for alleged corruption. The Court directed the Project Director to finalize orders based on an enquiry report within eight weeks and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Project Director (3rd Respondent) to pass final orders within eight weeks upon receipt of the enquiry report.

P.Annadurai Vs District Collector — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 14.06.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH

¶5

W.P.No.32966 of 2016

¶6

P.Annadurai ... Petitioner

¶7

v.
1. District Collector
Perambalur District,
Perambalur.
2. Block Development Officer (Panchayat)
Veppamthattai Panchayat Union,
Perambalur District.
3. Project Director
Rural Development Agency,
Perambalur District, Perambalur.
4. Assistant Project Director
Rural Development Agency,
Perambalur District, Perambalur.
5. S.Kumarasamy, Village President
Noothapur Village Panchayat,
Perambalur District, Perambalur.
(Cause title amended as per order dt.14.06.2017
made in WMP.30674/2016 in W.P.32966/2016
by MMSJ) ... Respondents

¶8

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1^st respondent to take action against the 5^th respondent for his acts of corruption and misappropriation of panchayat money, on the basis of the petitioner's representations dated 29.01.2016, 03.02.2016 and 13.07.2016.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Gnanasekar For Respondents : Mr.R.A.S.Senthilvel Additional Government Pleader (For RR1,3 &4)

¶10

No appearance for R2

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

The petitioner made several complaints against the fifth respondent before the third respondent. On receipt of the one of the representations, the third respondent by memorandum dated 03.07.2015, directed the fourth respondent to conduct an enquiry and send a report. As further action is forthcoming, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶14

Taking note of the above, a direction is issued to the third respondent to pass final orders after getting the report of the fourth respondent in pursuant to the memorandum in Na.Ka.A6/3400/2015 dated 03.07.2015, within a period of eights weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after due notice to the parties concerned.

¶15

The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. No
costs.
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CO)
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
raa
To
1. District Collector
Perambalur District,
Perambalur.
2. Block Development Officer (Panchayat)
Veppamthattai Panchayat Union,
Perambalur District.
3. Project Director
Rural Development Agency,
Perambalur District, Perambalur.
4. Assistant Project Director
Rural Development Agency,
Perambalur District, Perambalur.
+ 1 cc to M/s.M.Gnanasekar, Advocate,SR.42685
+ 1 cc to The Govt.Pleader, SR.42188
W.P.No.32966 of 2016

¶16

NR 08/08/2017

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Annadurai v. District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Annadurai v. District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Krishnasamy Vs The Assistant Electrical

P.Mani, Vs J.Muthulakshmi

M/s.K.Parthasarathy Spinning Vs The Chairman and

M.Sornam Vs The Collector

Uma Mohanraj Vs Secretary to Government

M.Subramaniam, Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu