Mrs.Vasanthi Mohan, v. 1.STATE of Tamilnadu Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel, who submitted that the proprietrix firm was closed and the matter became infructuous.
High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel, who submitted that the proprietrix firm was closed and the matter became infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.12.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR
W.P.No.32578 of 2003 Vasanthi Mohan, Proprietrix, Karthik Travels, 6/44, Corporation Shopping Complex, III Cross Street, R.A.Puram, Chennai-28. … Petitioner Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary to Govt., Labour and Employment Dept., Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2.The Deputy Commissioner [Labour] No.1, D.M.S. Complex, Teynampet, Chennai-6. 3.The Deputy Commissioner [Labour] No.2, D.M.S. Complex, Teynampet, Chennai-6. … Respondents
2
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the letter of the third respondent in C1/10321/2003 dated 29.10.2003 and to quash the same.
For Petitioner : Ms.R.Anitha For Respondents : Mr.M.Elumalai, Government Advocate ORDER
Ms.R.Anitha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the proprietrix concerned namely, Karthik Travels representing whom, the petitioner has moved this Writ Petition challenging the letter issued by the 3rd respondent/Conciliation Officer. She further submits that, the very proprietor firm namely Karthik Travels itself is no more in existence and the same has been closed long back.
counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that she would withdraw the Writ Petition itself and she has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.
3
Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the endorsement she has made in the Court bundle, this Writ
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn/infructuous. No costs.
08.12.2017
Index :yes/no
Internet :yes/no
speaking order /non speaking order
mps
To
1.The Secretary to Government,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Labour and Employment Dept.,
Fort St. George, Chennai-9.
2.The Deputy Commissioner [Labour] No.1,
D.M.S. Complex,
Teynampet,
Chennai-6.
3.The Deputy Commissioner [Labour] No.2,
D.M.S. Complex,
Teynampet,
Chennai-6.
4
R. SURESH KUMAR, J,
mps
W.P.No.32578 of 2003
08.12.2017
Vasanthi Mohan, Proprietrix, Karthik Travels
State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary to Govt., Labour and Employment Dept.
The Deputy Commissioner [Labour] No.1
The Deputy Commissioner [Labour] No.2
R. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court