In a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash proceedings related to a summons/debarment, the court found the prayer infructuous as the petitioner was permitted to rejoin for the next academic year and dismissed the petition as such.
Petition dismissed as infructuous with liberty to approach college authorities if further aggrieved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.02.2017
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
W.P. No. 29928 of 2011
and
M.P. No. 1 of 2011
S. Santosh
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Shastri Bhavan
New Delhi – 110 001.
2
.. Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the third respondent No. Nil dated 23.09.2011 and quash the same and pass such further orders.
For Petitioner : Mr. Gaanesh
For Respondents : Mr. S. Rathinasabapathy, SPCGC for R1
Mr. A.S. Vijayaraghavan, SCGSC for R2 & R3
No Appearance for R4 & R5
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed the present writ petition, seeking to quash the proceedings of the third respondent dated 23.09.2011.
3
impugned order was passed debarring the petitioner from the college for
the academic year 2011-2012 and that he would be allowed to re-join the same course for the next academic year 2012-2013. As such, the prayer
sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, nothing survives in this writ petition, to be adjudicated.
dismissed as infructuous, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the College authorities, if he is further aggrieved. Consequently, the connected M.P is closed. No costs.
15.02.2017
Index: Yes/ No
avr
To
4
New Delhi – 110 001.
D. KRISHNAKUMAR J.
avr
5
W.P. No. 29928 of 2011 and M.P. No. 1 of 2011
15.02.2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives adjudication given the petitioner was allowed to rejoin the course for the next academic year.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Santosh
The Secretary Ministry of Human Resource and Development
The Director General of Shipping
The Principal Coimbatore Marine College
Mr.S.I. Nathan
Vinayaka Mission University
D. KRISHNAKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
