Disposed

M.G.Subramani, S/o.Gopal v. The District Collector

Madras HC30 Oct 2017WP/27730/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, a former Panchayat President, sought a writ for permanent appointment of a Panchayat Secretary to address dengue fever control failures. The Court dismissed the appointment claim pending a jurisdictional determination but directed respondents to take immediate steps to control dengue fever.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to take appropriate steps to see that dengue fever is being controlled. Writ petition disposed without costs.

M.G.Subramani, S/o.Gopal Vs The District… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 30.10.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH

¶5

and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

¶6

W.P.No.27730 of 2017

¶7

M.G.Subramani ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The District Collector,
Panchayat Development (PAPD),
Kancheepuram District.
2. The Assistant Director,
Village Panchayat,
Kancheepuram District.
3. The Block Development Officer,
(Village Panchayat),
Panchayat Union,
Thiruporur,
Kancheepuram District. ... Respondents

¶8

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 25.09.2017 to appoint Panchayat Secretary/N.M.R. as temporarily or permanent in the Mullipakkam Village and Post, Manapathi Via, Thiruporur Taluk, Kancheepuram District – 603 105.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Chandrasekaran For Respondents : Mr.R.Vijayakumar Additional Government Pleader O R D E R

¶10

(Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)

¶11

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, who is a former President of Mullipakkam Panchayat, seeking a direction to pass an order on his representation dated 25.09.2017 by which a permanent appointment to the post of Panchayat Secretary is sought for the purpose of proper https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ administration of the said Panchayat.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that there is a spread of dengue fever in the locality of Mullipakkam Village, Thiruporur Taluk. No adequate steps have been taken to control dengue fever, in view of the absence of a permanent Panchayat Secretary, as only in-charge person is in control of the administration of Mullipakkam Panchayat.

¶13

Mr.R.Vijayakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the question with respect to the jurisdiction of the authority to appoint a permanent Panchayat Secretary on permanent basis is pending consideration before this Court.

¶14

The sum and substance of the grievance of the petitioner is that steps required to be taken to control spreading of dengue fever.

¶15

Therefore, we direct the respondents to take appropriate steps to see that dengue fever is being controlled.

¶16

With the above observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar bbr To 1. The District Collector, Panchayat Development (PAPD), Kancheepuram District. 2. The Assistant Director, Village Panchayat, Kancheepuram District. 3. The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayat), Panchayat Union, Thiruporur, Kancheepuram District. +1cc to Mr.R.Chandrasekaran, Advocate, S.R.No.76429 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.76943 W.P.No.27730 of 2017

¶17

AR V

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ CA(08/11/2017)

M.G.Subramani, S/o.Gopal v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.G.Subramani, S/o.Gopal v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Arumugam, Vs The Collector

S.a.Miyajan, Vs State of Tamilnadu rep.by its

A.P.Suryaprakasam Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Coimbatore Consumer Cause Vs State of Tamilnadu

G.Saravanan, Vs The Assistant Divisional

V.Anbazhagan Vs The Chief Secretary to