Dismissed

S.a.Miyajan, v. State of Tamilnadu rep.by its

Madras HC27 Oct 2017WP/21167/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Three writ petitions challenging the appointment of a Commission of Inquiry into the circumstances of former Chief Minister Jayalalitha's hospitalization and death were dismissed as infructuous after the court observed that such an enquiry had already been upheld in separate writ petitions.

What did the court decide?

Petitions dismissed as infructuous; consequentially closed cross-writ petition No.22060 of 2017; no costs.

S.a.Miyajan, Vs State of Tamilnadu rep.by its — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27.10.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH and

¶2

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

¶3

W.P.Nos.21167 & 153 of 2017 and W.P.(MD) No.323 of 2017 and WMP.Nos.22060 of 2017

¶4

W.P.No.21167 of 2017:
S.A.Miyajan ... Petitioner in
Person
Vs.
1.State of Tamil Nadu,
rep. by its Chief Secretary,
Fort St. George,
Chennai – 600 009.
2.Union of India,
rep. by its Secretary to Government,
Government of India,
Home Department,
New Delhi.
3.Sasikala
4.M/s.Apollo Hospitals,
rep. by its Managing Director,
Greams Road,
Chennai – 600 006.
5.The General Secretary,
All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam,
Lloyds Road,
Chennai – 600 014.
6.Nakeeran,
rep. by its Editor,
Jani Jahan Khan Road,
Royapettah,
Chennai – 600 014. ... Respondents

¶5

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶6

W.P.No.153 of 2017:

¶7

S.Gnanasekaran ... Petitioner Vs.

¶8

1.The Union of India, rep. by its Secretary to Union Government, Home Department, New Delhi.

¶9

2.The State of Tamil Nadu,

¶10

rep. by its Chief Secretary to the Government, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

¶11

3.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to the Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

¶12

4.The Director General of Police, Head of the Police Force, Chennai.

¶13

5.All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi – 110 029.

¶14

6.The Apollo Hospitals, Greams Road, Chennai.

¶15

7.All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, Head Office, No.226, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai – 600 014. ... Respondents

¶16

W.P.(MD) No.323 of 2017:

¶17

T.Ramasamy ... Petitioner Vs.

¶18

1.The Ministry of Home Affairs, rep. by its Home Secretary, North Block, Central Secretariat, New Delhi – 110 001.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

2.The Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, Plot No. 5B, 6^th Floor, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110 003.

¶21

3.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Chief Secretary to State, Secretariat Buildings, Fort St. George, Chennai.

¶22

4.V.K.Sasikala

¶23

5.The Chairman, Apollo Hospitals, No.21, Greams Lane, Chennai. ... Respondents

¶24

PRAYER in W.P.No.21167 of 2017: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 2^nd respondent to appoint a judicial enquiry commission headed by a Retd. High Court Justice assisted by two leading Doctors to ascertain the real cause of death of Dr.J.Jayalalitha Chief Minister of Tamilnadu on 05.12.2016 at the 4^th respondent's Hospital and if found to be on human negligence and malafides the persons responsible therefore and the nature of punishment if any to be given to them.

¶25

PRAYER in W.P.No.153 of 2017: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to appoint a committee consisting of medical experts associated with Central Bureau of Investigation with regard to enquiry for the death of Selvi J.Jayalithaa, who was then the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, by giving power to them to seize the records relating to the treatment, drugs administered, therapy performed and various life saving equipments used by the doctors for past two years from the physician who attended the ailment during the year 2015 to October, 2016 and post treatment given by Apollo Hospital and to ascertain the exact cause of her death, consequently direct the first respondent to initiate the criminal proceedings against the persons who are instrumental to the said unlawful acts to cause the death of Selvi J.Jayalalithaa after the conclusion arrived by the expert committee.

¶26

PRAYER in W.P.(MD) No.323 of 2017: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing 1^st and 3^rd respondents to handover all the documents pertaining to the affairs of the Hon'ble Chief

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

Minister Ms.J.Jayalalitha's hospitalization at the 5^th respondent hospital from 22.09.2016 to 05.12.2016 to the 2^nd respondent and consequential direction to the 2^nd respondent to conduct the enquiry and punich the wrong doers who committed the crime against the Hon'ble Chief Minister within the period stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.

¶29

For Petitioner in : No Appearance W.P.No.21167/2017 For Petitioner in : Mr.R.Gandhi W.P.No.153/2017 Senior Counsel for M/s.M.R.Elavarasan For Petitioner in : Mr.S.Ananth C.Rajesh WP(MD) No.323/2017 For Respondent No.1 in : Mr.T.N.Rajagopalan W.P.No.21167/2017 Government Pleader (i/c) Respondents 1 to 3 in W.P.No.153/2017 & Respondent No.3 in WP(MD) No.323/2017 For Respondent No.2 in : Mr.Su.Srinivasan W.P.No.21167/2017 Asst. Solicitor General Respondent Nos.1 & 2 in WP(MD)No.323/2017 For Respondent No.1 in : Mr.J.Madanagopal Rao W.P.No.153/2017 ***** COMMON ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)

¶30

No representation on behalf of the petitioner in W.P.No.21167 of 2017. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.Nos.153 of 2017 and W.P.(MD) No.323 of 2017.

¶31

It is brought to our notice by Mr.T.N.Rajagopalan, learned Government Pleader (i/c) that after filing of these writ petitions, a retired High Court Judge has been appointed to conduct an enquiry into the circumstances and situation leading to the hospitalization of late Chief Minister J.Jayalalithaa, vide G.O.Ms.No.817, Public (S.C.) Department, dated 25.09.2017 and G.O.Ms.No.829, Public (S.C.) Department, dated 27.09.2017.

¶32

The appointment of Commission of Inquiry consisting of a retired Judge of the High Court of Madras to inquire into the

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶34

circumstances and situation leading to the hospitalization of the late Chief Minister was challenged in W.P.No.25940 of 2017 and the said writ petition has been dismissed by the First Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.10.2017 and thus, the appointment of Commission of Inquiry was upheld.

¶35

It is also brought to our notice that writ petition being W.P.No.25652 of 2017 filed by one Muruganandham seeking to appoint a Judicial enquiry headed by a retired High Court Judge has been dismissed as infructous by the First Bench of this Court vide order dated 03.10.2017.

¶36

In such view of the matter, nothing survives for
consideration in these writ petitions and the same are dismissed
as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, WMP.No.22060 of 2017
is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
bbr
To
1.The Secretary to Union Government,
Union of India,
Home Department, New Delhi.

¶37

2.The Chief Secretary to the Government, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

¶38

3.The Secretary to the Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

¶39

4.The Director General of Police, Head of the Police Force, Chennai.

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶41

5.All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS),
Ansari Nagar,
New Delhi – 110 029.
6.The Director,
Central Bureau of Investigation,
Plot No. 5B, 6 th Floor,
CGO Complex,
Lodhi Road,
New Delhi – 110 003.
+1 cc to Mr.S.A.Miyajan Advocate sr 7701
+1 cc to Mr.M.R.Elavarasan Advocate sr 76088
+1 cc to Mr.J.Madanagopal Rao Advocate sr 76415
W.P.Nos.2
1167 & 153 of 2017 & WP(MD) No.323 of 2017
rsy(co)
aa14/11/2017

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.a.Miyajan, v. State of Tamilnadu rep.by its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.a.Miyajan, v. State of Tamilnadu rep.by its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Aruna Vs S.A. Salamath Begum

Malu Sleepers Ltd., Vs the Union of India

Auroville Foundation Vs Ramaniyam Real Estates

Mohammed S Pathan Vs Indusind Bank Ltd.

K.R.Duraisamy, Vs The District Collector

K.Selvaraji Vs The District Collector