Mr.D.Sundararajan, v. Repco Bank, a Govt of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking to quash foreclosure notices as the petition was withdrawn by the petitioner with the Court's permission.
The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking to quash foreclosure notices as the petition was withdrawn by the petitioner with the Court's permission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 31.01.2017
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
W.P.No.26339 of 2013 and MP.No.1 of 2013
D.Sundararajan ... Petitioner .. Vs .. REPCO Bank, a Government of India Enterprise, rep.by M.Palani, Deputy General Manager, REPCO Bank, T.Nagar Branch, 'REPCO TOWER', No.33, North Usman Road, T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017. ... Respondent
Writ Petition under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to quash the foreclosure notices RCB-128 dated 12.6.2013 (Rc.No.SDL A/c No.1159/2013-14/TNR and Rc.No.SDL A/c No.1176/2013-14/TNR dated 6.5.2013 issued by the respondent herein to the petitioner herein.
For Petitioner : Mr.Nithyaesh Natraj
For Respondents : Mr.A.Ilangovan
O R D E R
In view of the endorsement and the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
asvm
+1cc to Mr.Nithyaesh Natraj, Advocate, S.R.No.6203 +1cc to Mr.A.Ilangovan, Advocate, S.R.No.6212
W.P.No.26339 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
KS(CO) CA(02/02/2017)
D.Sundararajan
REPCO Bank
D.KRISHNAKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court