Writ petition seeking reinstatement was dismissed as infructuous after respondents filed that the petitioner was already working deputationally at Mailam Block Resource Centre, rendering the transfer issue moot.
Dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous with liberty to submit a representation for regular transfer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated :30.01.2017
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
W.P.No.28899 of 2013
and
M.P.No.1 of 2013
V.Jayaraman ...Petitioner
.. Vs ..
1.The Joint Director of School Education (Personnel),
The Director of School Education,
DPI Campus, College Road,
Chennai – 600 006.
2.The Additional Chief Educational Officer
(Sarva Shiksha Abiyan),
Villupuram District,
Villupuram.
3.R.Murugan ..Respondents
Writ Petition under Article 226 of The Constitution of India
praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to
call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by
the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.35583/C4/E3/2013 dated
7.10.2013 and to quash the same insofar as trasnferring the
petitioner to Olakkur Block Resource Centre, Villupuram District
instead of re-instating the petitioner at Mailam Block Resource
Centre, Villupuram District and consequently, direct the
respondents to re-instate the petitioner in Mailam Block
Recourse Centre, Villupuram District.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sankaran For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mrs.P.Rajalakshmi, Government Advocate For 3rd respondent : No appearance
O R D E R
Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate submitted that nothing survives in the Writ Petition for consideration as the petitioner was transferred to Mailam Block Resource Centre, Villupuram, on deputation basis and is working in the said place. The said statement was not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks for liberty to make a representation before the respondents for regular transfer.
ala(CO) md(16/02/2017)
W.P.No.28899 of 2013 and MP.No.1 of 2013
V. Jayaraman
The Joint Director of School Education (Personnel) and others
D. Krishnakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
