Writ petition seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the issuance of a tender schedule was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's absence from the hearing.
Writ petition dismissed for default; connected W.M.P. closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.08.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
W.P.No.23578 of 2004
and W.M.P.No.28551 of 2004
S.Umapathi .. Petitioner
Vs.
1. Superintending Engineer (Highways)
NABARD and Rural Works,
Chengalpet District.
2. Divisional Engineer (Highways),
NABARD and Rural Works,
Vellore. .. Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the
respondent herein to issue tender schedule covered under the
tender advertisement No.10/2004-2005.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondents : Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali,
Government Advocate
ORDER
When the Writ Petition was taken up for hearing on
26.07.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner.
Hence, the Writ Petition was directed to be listed under the
caption 'for dismissal' on 02.08.2017 (today). Even today, there
is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Writ
Petition is dismissed for default. Consequently, connected
W.M.P.No.28551 of 2004 is closed. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
asi/sts
To
W.P.No.23578 of 2004
MSM (CO)
GN(31/08/2017 )
S.Umapathi
Superintending Engineer (Highways), NABARD and Rural Works, Chengalpet District
Divisional Engineer (Highways), NABARD and Rural Works, Vellore
S.Vaidyanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
