Disposed

Venkatesh v. The District collector

Madras HC23 Aug 2017WP/22441/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of writ petitions seeking a mandamus to issue house site patta. Without adjudicating merits, the Court directed the second respondent to consider representations and pass orders after notifying interested parties within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to consider representations and pass orders after notice to interested parties within eight weeks.

Venkatesh Vs The District collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 23.08.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶5

W.P.Nos.22441 to 22449 of 2017

¶6

1.Venkatesh ... Petitioner in W.P.No.22441 of 2017
2.Pettamma ... Petitioner in W.P.No.22442 of 2017
3.Sarasamma ... Petitioner in W.P.No.22443 of 2017
4.Rajappa ... Petitioner in W.P.No.22444 of 2017
5.Thimmakka ... Petitioner in W.P.No.22445 of 2017
6.Anitha ... Petitioner in W.P.No.22446 of 2017
7.Ambika ... Petitioner in W.P.No.22447 of 2017
8.Nagaraj ... Petitioner in W.P.No.22448 of 2017
9.Radha ... Petitioner in W.P.No.22449 of 2017
Vs.
1.The District Collector,
Krishnagiri,
Krishnagiri District.
2.The Thasildar,
Taluk Office,
Hosur,
Krishnagiri District. ... Respondents in all W.P.Nos.

¶7

Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to issue house site patta in the petitioners' names in respect of land in survey No.304 of Soppatti Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District by considering petitioners' representations dated 17.04.2017.

¶8

For Petitioners : Mr.K.Thiruvengadam (in all W.Ps') For Respondents : Mr.R.Rajeswaran (in all W.Ps') Special Government Pleader

¶9

COMMON ORDER

¶10

Mr.R.Rajeswaran, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the main Writ Petitions are taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

2.The petitioners have filed the above Writ Petitions to issue a writs of mandamus, directing the respondents to issue house site patta in their names in respect of land in survey No.304 of Soppatti Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District by considering their representations dated 17.04.2017.

¶13

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that in spite of the petitioners' representations dated 17.04.2017 for the issuance of patta, the second respondent has not passed any order so far.

¶14

4.Mr.R.Rajeswaran, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the second respondent may be directed to consider the petitioners' representations dated 17.04.2017 and pass orders in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested parties.

¶15

5.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the matter, I direct the second respondent to consider the petitioners' representations dated 17.04.2017 and pass orders in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested parties, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶16

6.With this observation, the Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.

¶17

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

¶18

Rj/ah To 1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri Krishnagiri District. 2.The Thasildar, Taluk Office, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. + 1 cc to Mr. K. Thiruvengadam, Advocate SR.60713 + 1 cc to the Government Pleader Sr.61341

¶19

W.P.Nos.22441 to 22449 of 2017 VD(CO) EU 11/09/17

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Venkatesh v. The District collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Venkatesh v. The District collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Kesavan, Vs The Commissioner

Tmt.C.R.Rajalakshmi, Vs The Commissioner

R.Chandrasekar Vs Annamalai University

M.Muthusamy Vs The District Collector

S.Mohan, Vs The Tahsildar

Southern Polypet P.Ltd., Vs The Union of India