Allowed

G.Kesavan, v. The Commissioner

Madras HC22 Aug 2017WP/20734/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose of an appeal within a time frame. The court directed the respondent to dispose of the appeal within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the first respondent to dispose of the appeal within eight weeks after giving notice to all interested persons.

G.Kesavan, Vs The Commissioner — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.08.2017

¶2

CORAM

¶3

The Honourable MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶4

W.P.No.20734 of 2017

¶5

G.Kesavan ... Petitioner

¶6

¶7

1.The Commissioner,
Land Administration Department,
Ezhilagam, Chepauk,
Chennai-5.
2.The District Revenue Officer,
Vellore District,
Vellore,
3.The Executive Officer,
Arulmigu Ellaiamman Thirukovil,
Vettuvanam, Vellore Taluk,
Vellore District. ... Respondents

¶8

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose the Appeal No.K3/11591/2014 dated 28.04.2014 within a time framed manner in accordance with law.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Meganathan

¶10

For Respondents : Mr.R.Rajeswaran, Special Government Pleader for R1 & R2

¶11

Mr.M.Maharaja, Special Government Pleader for R3

¶12

ORDER Mr.M.Maharaja, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice for the third respondent. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage.

¶13

The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose the Appeal No.K3/11591/2014 dated 28.04.2014 within a time frame.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that inspite of the petitioner's appeal dated 28.04.2014, the first respondent has not passed any order so far.

¶16

Mr.R.Rajeswaran, learned Special Government Pleader, who took notice for respondents 1 and 2, submitted that the first respondent may be directed to dispose of the appeal in accordance with law within the time frame.

¶17

In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the first respondent to dispose of the appeal dated 28.04.2014 preferred by the petitioner in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested persons, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed
of . No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
raa
To
1.The Commissioner,
Land Administration Department,
Ezhilagam, Chepauk,
Chennai-5.
2.The District Revenue Officer,
Vellore District,
Vellore,
3.The Executive Officer,
Arulmigu Ellaiamman Thirukovil,
Vettuvanam, Vellore Taluk,
Vellore District.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

+1 cc to M/s.T.Meganathan Advocate sr 60453

¶21

+2 ccs to the Government Pleader sr 60817 & 61100

¶22

W.P.No.20734 of 2017

¶23

rj(co)
aa07/09/2017

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.Kesavan, v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Kesavan, v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Ramesh Vs The District Collector

S.Manohar, Vs The Tahsildar

R.Santhalingam, Vs The Revenue Divisional

Tmt.C.R.Rajalakshmi, Vs The Commissioner

R.Chandrasekar Vs Annamalai University

K.Kumaravel, Vs The Commissioner