The Court disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner sought a direction to the respondent (Tashildhar) to survey a specific plot of land. Direction was issued for the survey within eight weeks.
Respondent directed to consider petitioner's representation dated 05.07.2017 and survey the land within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.08.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.22426 of 2017
S.Mohan ... Petitioner
Vs.
The Tashildhar, Thiruporur Taluk, Thiruporur, Kancheepuram District. ... Respondent
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus, to direct the respondent to survey plot measuring an extent of 1200 sq.ft. comprised in survey No.148/2, Patta No.1896, as per patta survey No.148/4, Mudhura Nagar, No.46, Thaiyur Village, Thiruporur Taluk, Kancheepuram District within a time fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.S.Mannarsamy
For Respondent : Mr.S.N.Parthasarathi Government Advocate O R D E R
Mr.S.N.Parthasarathi, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondent. By consent, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2.The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to survey the plot measuring an extent of 1200 sq.ft. comprised in Survey No.148/2, Patta No.1896, as per patta survey No.148/4, Mudhura Nagar, No.46, Thaiyur Village, Thiruporur Taluk, Kancheepuram District, within a time frame.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has given a representation to the respondent for surveying his land on 05.07.2017. However, the respondent has not surveyed the land till today. Further, the learned counsel submitted that the petitioner had paid the requisite fee for conducting survey of the land.
4.Mr.S.N.Parthasarathi, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submitted that the respondent may be directed to survey the land in accordance with law, within https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ a period of eight weeks.
5.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, I direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.07.2017 for conducting the survey of his land and pass orders in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6.With this observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Rj/ah
To
The Tashildhar,
Thiruporur Taluk,
Thiruporur, Kancheepuram District.
+1cc to Mr.V.S.Mannarsamy, Advocate, S.R.No.60449
+1cc to Government Pleader, Advocate, S.R.No.61690
W.P.No.22426 of 2017
GP(CO)
GN(04/09/2017 )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent is directed to survey the petitioner's land within a fixed time period.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Mohan
The Tashildhar, Thiruporur Taluk
M. Duraismamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
