Writ petition challenging a Central Administrative Tribunal order directing Respondents to consider a third party's promotion claim. Court held there was no adverse order affecting petitioners and disposed of the petition.
Writ petition disposed of with clarification; liberty given to petitioners to consider the claim on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.04.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN AND THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN
W.P.No.22390 of 2016 and
WMP. No.19103 of 2016
1.Union of India rep. by Rep. by the General Manager, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003. 2.The Chief Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003. 3.The Deputy Chief Engineer, Track Machines, Southern Railway, Royapuram. ... Petitioners Vs. 1.M.Gnanajothy 2.The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records on the file of the 2nd respondent in O.A.No.610 of 2013, dated 26.06.2015 and quash the same.
For Petitioners : Mrs.V.Bhavani Subbaroyan
For Respondents : Mr.L.Chandrakumar for R1 R2-Tribunal
K.K.SASIDHARAN,J.
This writ petition is directed against the order, dated 26 June, 2015 in O.A.No.610 of 2013, whereby and where under, the Madras Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal, directed the petitioners to consider the claim of the first respondent in the light of the instructions in RBE.No.160 of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2006, dated 23 October 2016 and pass appropriate orders.
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CS IV )
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
To
The Registrar,
Central Administrative Tribunal
Madras Bench.
+1 cc to Mr.V.Bhavani Subbaraya, Advocate,sr 20527
+1 cc to M/s.L.Chandrakumar,advocate,sr.22591.
rr(co)
krd 5/5
W.P.No.22390 of 2016
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court erred in directing Railways to consider the claim of an applicant seeking promotion based on existing instructions and a precedent appointment.
Whether the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal passed an adverse impugned order requiring certiorari to be entertained.
Union of India rep. by General Manager, Southern Railway
The Chief Personnel Officer, Southern Railway
The Deputy Chief Engineer, Track Machines, Southern Railway
M.Gnanajothy
The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench
K.K.SASIDHARAN
M.V.MURALIDARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
