The Division Bench dismissed a review application filed by a petitioner who had accepted a Central Administrative Tribunal award but sought to challenge it after the opposite party's writ petition was dismissed, holding the review ma
Review Application No.155 of 2016 dismissed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Date : 12.04.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN
Review Application No.155 of 2016 in W.P.No.16387 of 2011 and WMP No.33589 of 2016
C.Palaniappan
... Petitioner
Vs.
... Respondents
Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of C.P.C., to review the order dated 11.10.2012 in W.P.No.16387 of 2011.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Parthiban
For Respondents : Mr.R.Krishna Prasad for
M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates for R1 and R2
2
O R D E R
K.K.SASIDHARAN,J.
This review application is filed by the second respondent in W.P.No.16387 of 2011, to review the order dismissing the writ petition filed by the Director, Pasteur Institute of India and the Union of India, represented by Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.
3
chosen to assail the correctness of the order passed by the Tribunal. Even then, the petitioner failed to challenge the order passed by the Tribunal before this Court.
4
K.K.SASIDHARAN.,J. and
M.V.MURALIDARAN.,J.
(svki)
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
(K.K.SASIDHARAN.,J.) (M.V.MURALIDARAN.,J.) 12 April 2017
Index : Yes/No
svki
To
Rev.Application No.155 of 2016
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a review application is maintainable filed by a party who accepted an adjudication order before the Tribunal and did not challenge it when challenged by the opposite side.
Whether the dismissal of a writ petition filed by respondents against the Tribunal's order gives a right to the original aggrieved petitioner to agitate the issue for the first time.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C.Palaniappan
The Director, Pasteur Institute of India
Union of India
Dr A Premkumar
K.K.SASIDHARAN
M.V.MURALIDARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
