Disposed

S.Anand v. The Director of School

Madras HC12 Apr 2017WP/34413/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner withdrew a writ petition seeking to correct his community certificate before the schools and education director to reflect his Backward Class status. The Court directed the Zonal Deputy Tahsildar to consider a fresh application on merits within two months.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner's writ petition withdrawn with liberty to apply to the Zonal Deputy Tahsildar: directed to dispose of fresh application on merits within two months.

S.Anand Vs The Director of School — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 12.04.2017

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN

¶5

W.P.No.34413 of 2016

¶6

S.Anand ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Director of School Education College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai. 2.The Principal KSR College of Engineering KSR Kalvi Nagar, Tiruchengodu. 3.The Principal Maruthi Higher Secondary School Attur Taluk, Salem District. 4.The Principal Vetri Vikas Higher Secondary School Rasipuram, Namakkal District. 5.The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar Attur Taluk, Salem District. ... Respondents

¶7

[R-5 suo motu impleaded as per order dt.13.03.2017]

¶8

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.07.2016 in the light of the decision laid down in (1996) 3 SCC 545 and correct the community as Nathamar belongs to Backward Class instead of Jangam belongs to the Most Backward Class in the transfer certificate maintained by all the respondents herein.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

For Petitioner: Mr.A.Rajakumar

¶11

For R1 & R5 : Mr.A.Kumar

¶12

Special Government Pleader

¶13

For R2 : Mr.K.S.Jayaganesan

¶14

For R3 & R4 : Served No Appearance

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

K.K. SASIDHARAN,J.

¶17

The petitioner filed this writ petition to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to correct his community as Nathamar, which is a Backward Community, instead of the present status as Most Backward Community.

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner made an endorsement indicating that he is withdrawing the writ petition with liberty to make a fresh application before the Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Salem, to issue a Certificate indicating that he belongs to Nathamar Community, which is a notified Backward Class Community.

¶19

We make it clear that in case an application is made by the petitioner for Community Certificate, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the fifth respondent on merits and as per law, notwithstanding the Certificate issued earlier indicating that he belongs to Most Backward Community. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the application.

¶20

The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

¶21

Assistant Registrar(CCC)

¶22

//True Copy//

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

¶25

1.The Director of School Education College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai.

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

2.The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar Attur Taluk, Salem District.

¶28

+1cc to Mr.K.S.Jeyaganeshan, Advocate Sr.22006 +1cc to Mr.A.Rajakumar, Advocate Sr.22033

¶29

+1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.22303

¶30

W.P.No.34413 of 2016

¶31

nm1[co]
srg 21/04/2017

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Anand v. The Director of School

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Anand v. The Director of School

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Sankaran, Vs The Sub- Collector

L.Lavanya Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

V.Rajkumar Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

A.P.Arun, Vs Jawaharlal Institute of Post

C.Palaniappan, Vs The Director

S.Radha Krishnan Vs State of Tamilnadu