The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus against interference with property possession. The petitioner applied to withdraw the petition; the court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.01.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
W.P.No.2084 of 2011
&
M.P.No.1 of 2011
R.Saravanaprabhu
...Petitioner
Versus
Prayers: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents, his men, agents herein from interfering or disturbing the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the properties in item No.1. Vacant site measuring 29'.9” feet North-South and 27 feet East-West, admeasuring an extent of 803 ¼ sq.ft. in S.No.136/6B bounded on the North by plot No.B, South by Dharmalingam's vacant site, East by 10 feet Common passage west by Gengammal's site Item No.2. Vacant site measuring 29'.9” feet North South and 27 feet East-West, admeasuring an extent of 803 ¼ sq.ft. in S.No.136/6C bounded on the North by plot No.C, South by Plot No.A, East by 10 feet Common passage, West by Gengammal's site Item No.3. Vacant site measuring 29'.9” feet North South and 27 feet East West, admeasuring an extent of 803 ¼ Sq.ft. in S.No.136/6D bounded on the North by Thiruvalluvar Salai, South by Plot No.B, East by 10 feet Common passage, West by Gengammal's site all the items 1, 2 and 3 are in Thiruvallur Salai, Kaikankuppam Village, within the limits of Valasaravakkam Third Grade Municipality except by due process of law.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.A. Vimal Mohan For RR1 : Mr.S.Diwakar, Spl.G.P. For RR2 : Mr.P.S.Jayakumar For RR3 to 5 : Writ Petition is Dismissed vide order, dt. 24.02.2012
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks
permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he
has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. Recording the above submission made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner and the endorsement made, the Writ
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently,
connected M.P. is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
pvs
To
1.The Inspector of Police,
R-9, Valasaravakkam Police Station,
Valasaravakkam, Chennai 600 087.
2.The Executive Officer,
Valasaravakkam Municipality,
Valasaravakkam, Chennai 600 086.
+1cc to M.A.Vimal Mohan, Advocate Sr.3644
W.P.No.2084 of 2011
ksj[co] srg 6/2/2017
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Saravanaprabhu
Inspector of Police
Executive Officer
D.Mahalakshmi
D.Vijayalakshmi
J.C.Beaula
D. KRISHNAKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
