High Court of Madras directed the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.05.2014 regarding pay scale fixation within 12 weeks. The writ petition was disposed of without detailed judicial comments on merits.
Third respondent directed to consider the representation submitted on 27.05.2014 and pass orders on merits within 12 weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 30.10.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.18936 of 2014
P.Saraswathi ..Petitioner
Vs
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vijayan For Respondents : Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari Government Advocate
O R D E R
Heard, Mr.S.Vijayan, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari, Government Advocate the learned counsel for the respondents.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar msrm To 1. The Secretary to Government School Education Department, State of Tamilnadu Fort St.George Chennai – 600 009.
+2cc to Government Pleader High Court, Madras, Sr.No.77355,77501
W.P.No.18936 of 2014 VGII(CO) sm:28.11.2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's representation regarding pay scale fixation.
P.Saraswathi
State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by its Secretary to Government School Education Department
The Director of School Education
The Chief Educational Officer Namakkal
The District Educational Officer Namakkal
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
