Tmt. Shanthi, v. the Secretary to Government
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioners challenged a rejection order for compassionate appointment. The court held that since the third respondent had already appointed the second petitioner in a subsequent order (2015), no further adjudication was needed. Consequently, the writ petition was closed without costs.
What did the court decide?
The Writ Petition is closed and dismissed with no costs.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.10.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.9194 of 2014
1.Shanthi
2.G.Sudhagar ..Petitioners
Vs.
1.The Secretary to Government
Government of Tamil Nau
Labour & Employment Departmental
Fort St.George
Chennai 600 009.
2.The Joint Commissioner
Revenue Administration
Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.
3.The District Collector
Karur District, Karur. ..Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned order dated 14.11.2013 in Na.Ka.Nok.A3/21588/2008 passed by the third respondent and quash the same and further direct the respondents to provide employment to the 2 nd petitioner for compassionate appointment in any suitable post.
For Petitioners ..Mr.P.P.Shanmugasundaram
For Respondents ..Mr.A.Raja Perumal
Addl.Govt.Pleader
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition requires further adjudication on merits given a subsequent order of appointment.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shanthi
- petitioner
G.Sudhagar
- respondent
The Secretary to Government Government of Tamil Nau Labour & Employment Departmental Fort St.George Chennai 600 009
- respondent
The Joint Commissioner Revenue Administration Chepauk, Chennai 600 005
- respondent
The District Collector Karur District, Karur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court