Petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking cancellation of a mortgage deed and return of title deeds. During the hearing, counsel for petitioners sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition upon receiving the documents, prompting dismissal.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.08.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.16425 of 2016
and
WMP.No.14191 of 2016
1.R.Padmavathi
2.Geetha
3.Dhanasekar
4.Sumathi
5.Kannan
6.Srinivasan
7.Latha ... Petitioners
v.
1. The Managing Director,
REPCO Bank, REPCO Tower
No.33, North Usman Road,
T.Nagar, Chennai - 17.
2. The Manager,
REPCO Bank,
4th Main Road,
Adayar, Chennai - 20. ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to cancel the mortgage deed registered under Document No.2182 of 2000 dated 14.11.2000 and return the original title deeds pertaining to the property situated in Old S.No.32/1, New No.79,
2
M.DURAISWAMY, J.
rk
Venkatesan Street, Chinthadripet, Chennai -2 along with landed property comprised in R.S.No.519 Chinthadripet Village, Chennai District to the petitioners.
For Petitioners : Ms.Karthiga for Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondents : Mr.A.Ilangovan
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this
Court to withdraw this petition for the reason that the petitioners have received all the documents from the respondent bank. Learned counsel also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
02.08.2017 Index: Yes/No
rk
W.P.No.16425 of 2016
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition for cancellation of mortgage deed and return of title deeds should be allowed when the petitioners have withdrawn the same?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R. Padmavathi, Geetha, Dhanasekar, Sumathi, Kannan, Srinivasan, Latha
The Managing Director, REPCO Bank
The Manager, REPCO Bank
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
