3.The appellant insisted before this Court that her height was 160 cm and she was qualified to participate in the selection process. Since this Court felt that her case was not properly considered, we called upon the Deputy General of Police, Madurai, to be present before this Court and to measure the height of the appellant. When the height of the appellant was digitally measured, it was 158.4 cm, but, when her height was manually measured with the tape procured from the dispensary, it was seen that her height was 160 cm. In view of the discrepancy, the height of the appellant was measured for the third time in the local office of the first respondent Board. Since the appellant raised certain disputes, the measurement of the height was ordered to be taken in her presence by using the calibrated scale by the officials from the Metrological Department itself.