The High Court of Madras dismissed the miscellaneous writ appeal filed by S. Ragunath on the ground that the appellant withdrew the appeal after arguments. There was no order as to costs.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 05.09.2017
Coram
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDER &
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.A.No.919 of 2017
S.Ragunath
... Appellant Vs. 1. Central board of Secondary Education, Rep. by its Chairman Shiksha Kendra-2 Community Centre/preet Vihar Delhi - 110 092.
Writ Appeal has been filed under clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying to set aside the order of the learned Judge dated 31.01.2017 passed in W.P.No.27735 of 2016.
writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying for writ of mandamus, Directing the respondents 1 to 3 to initiate action against the 4th respondent for not prescribing CBSE Syllabus books and collecting excess amount for books notebooks and uniform and to permit the students to buy books notebooks and uniform in the open market and also to ensure refund of excess amount collected in the said heading for the academic year 2016-2017 and to Direct the 4th respondent school to prescribe CBSE Syllabus books and to constitute School Management Committee in the school
For Appellant : M/s.Meenakshi
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was made by RAJIV SHAKDER, J)
05.09.2017
S. Ragunath
Central Board of Secondary Education
Public Grievance Redressal Officer (PGRO) Central Board of Secondary Education
Amrita Vidyalayam School
Rajiv Shakder
Abdul Qudhuse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
