Dismissed

K.Arumugam v. The chairman

Madras HC4 Sept 2017WA/994/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Writ Appeal filed to set aside an order in W.P.No.42046 of 2016 regarding TNEB tower erection was withdrawn by learned counsel for the appellant with liberty to approach the court below regarding a deviation in land alignment. The appellate court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Single Judge regarding the deviation in the plan for another landholder.

K.Arumugam Vs The chairman — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 04.09.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDER &

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

W.A.No.994 of 2017

¶7

and

¶8

C.M.P.No.13885 of 2017

¶9

K.Arumugam ... Appellant/Petitioner

¶10

Vs.

¶11

The Chairman Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Anna Salai Chennai – 600 002.

¶12

The Assistant Executive Engineer TLC II Mettupalayam Power House Campus Sirumugai Road, Mettupalayam Coimbatore – 641 301.

¶13

The Superintending Engineer/GCC 182, Dr.Suhbbarayan Road, TATABAD Coimbatore – 641 012.

¶14

The Chief Engineer/Distribution Coimbatore Region Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road TATABAD Coimbatore – 641 012.

¶15

The District Collector Tiurppur. ... Respondents/Respondents

¶16

Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent, praying to set aside the order passed in W.P.No.42046 of 2016 dated 30.11.2016.

¶17

W.P.No.42046 of 2016 : Writ Petition filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the 5th respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka. NO.8291/2016/vu4 dated 4.10.2016 quash the same consequently

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

directing the respondent to erect the electric towers in such a way that the electric line is laid passing through along with the border of the land in Alandur Village, Avinashi Taluk, Tirupur District (Id S. No.717) S.F. No.717/1A S. No.717/ 1B S.F. No.717/3 S.F. No.717/6A S.F. No.717/ 6B S.F.No.717/2A S.F. No.717/2B S.F. No.717/4 S.F. No.717/5 and S.F. No.717/7 covering an area of 6.19 acres of agricultural land.

¶20

For Respondents : Mr.P.S.Siva Shanmugasundaram, Special Government Pleader

¶21

After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellant says that insofar as another landholder is concerned, the respondents have deviated from the plan evolved for erection of towers, whereas, in the appellant's case, despite request, the respondents did not agree to deviate from the plan, even though realignment is feasible.

¶22

1.1. On being queried, learned counsel for the appellant says that this fact came to notice only, after the order was passed by the learned Single Judge.

¶23

Learned counsel for the appellant, thus, says that he will move an appropriate application to bring the said fact to the notice of the learned Single Judge, and, therefore would like to withdraw the present appeal, with liberty being given in that behalf.

¶24

The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for, albeit, in accordance with law. Consequently, connected application will stand closed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.

¶25

Assistant Registrar(CS III)

¶26

//True Copy//

¶27

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶28

vsm

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

¶31

The Chairman
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Anna Salai
Chennai – 600 002.
2. The Assistant Executive Engineer
TLC II Mettupalayam Power House
Campus
Sirumugai Road, Mettupalayam
Coimbatore – 641 301.
3. The Superintending Engineer/GCC
182, Dr.Suhbbarayan Road, TATABAD
Coimbatore – 641 012.
4. The Chief Engineer/Distribution
Coimbatore Region
Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road
TATABAD Coimbatore – 641 012.
5. The District Collector
Tiurppur.
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.64524
W.A.No.994 of 2017
VG II(CO)
CA(03/10/2017)

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Arumugam v. The chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Arumugam v. The chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.R.Trust Vs Dr.J.Radhakrishnan, IAS

S.Murgan, Vs The Secretary

Yogeswari, W/o.Gopinath Vs The State rep by

P.Hari Das Vs Shri Manoj Kumar Sonthalia

The Chairman Vs v.Kolanchiappan

The Chairman Vs Dr. Ramanathan Ram Kumar