This is an appeal against an order dismissing an application to hold an enquiry into alleged forgery of signatures on an adoption memo. The High Court found no error in the lower judge's approach and dismissed the appeal.
Impugned order dated 11.07.2017 dismissed; connected pending application stands closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 05.09.2017
Coram
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDER &
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
O.S.A.No.219 of 2017 and C.M.P.No.15063 of 2017
Original Side Appeal has been filed under order XXXVI Rule 9 of O.S.Rules read with clause 15 of letters patent, praying to set aside the impugned order dated 11-07-2017 in Application No.4828 of 2015 in C.S.No.255 of 2003.
For Appellants: Mr.S.Sivakumar
Party in Person
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was made by RAJIV SHAKDER, J)
2.1. To be noted, the adoption memo, which is dated 24.07.2008 was signed by defendant Nos.7 to 10, whereby they adopted the written statement filed by the defendant No.6, one, Mrs.J.Parvathy, who has since then expired.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
raja/vsm
TO
The Sub Assistant Registrar, (Original Side) High Court, Madras.
+2 ccs to Mr. S. Sivakumar, Advocate Sr.63935
BR(CO) EU(10/10/2017 )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Learned Single Judge erred in dismissing an application for enquiry regarding forgery of signatures on an adoption memo.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mrs. S. Bhuvaneswari
Mrs. D. Anusuya
Mrs. S. Balakujambal
Mr. J. Soundararajan
Mr. J. Thiruvengadam
Mr. J. Shanmugam
Rajiv Shakder
Abdul Quddhose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
