Allowed

S. Abinaya v. N. Vinothraj

Madras HC15 Jun 2017TR CMP/798/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed a transfer petition filed under Section 24 CPC to transfer a Maintenance and Restitution of Conjugal Rights case from Madurai to Dharmapuri. The Court held that wife's convenience must be preferred in matrimonial transfers due to distance and the wife's unemployment.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of H.M.O.P.No.948 of 2016 from Family Court, Madurai to Family Court, Dharmapuri for joint trial with FCMC.No.44 of 2016.

S. Abinaya Vs N. Vinothraj — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 15.06.2017

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI

¶5

Tr.C.M.P. No.798 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.20235 of 2016

¶6

S. Abinaya ... Petitioner Vs. N.Vinothraj ... Respondent

¶7

Prayer:- Petition has been filed under Section 24 of C.P.C., to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.948 of 2016 from the file of the Family Court(Principal Subordinate Court) Madurai and transfer the same to the Family Court, Dharmapuri.

¶8

For Petitioner : Ms.M.Sudha For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Raghavan O R D E R

¶9

For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Raghavan

¶10

This petition is filed to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.948 of 2016 from the file of the Family Court(Principal Subordinate Court) Madurai and transfer to the file of the Family Court, Dharmapuri.

¶11

The petitioner is the wife and respondent is the husband. The marriage between the petitioner and respondent was conducted on 23.01.2013 as per Hindu rites and customs. In the wedlock, a male child was born on 16.10.2013 to them. Due to difference of opinion, the petitioner and the respondent are living separately. The respondent filed H.M.O.P.No.948 of 2016 for restitution of conjugal rights, on the file of the Family Court (Principal Subordinate Court) Madurai. The petitioner filed FCMC.No.44 of 2016 on the file of Family Court, Dharmapuri seeking maintenance for herself and her child.

¶12

According to the petitioner, she is residing at Dharmapuri with her parents along with her minor child. The distance between Dharmapuri and Madurai is more than 300 kilometres and hence, it is very difficult for her to travel from Dharmapuri to Madurai to attend the hearing. Moreover, she is unemployed and is depending on her parents. Therefore, she prays for transfer of H.M.O.P.No.948 of 2016 from the file of

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

the Family Court(Principal Subordinate Court) Madurai to the file of the Family Court, Dharmapuri.

¶15

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent.

¶16

It is well settled law that whenever, the transfer application is filed in matrimonial disputes, the convenience of the wife shall be given preference, as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the Judgments reported in 2008 (9) SCC 353 [Arti Rani @ Pinki Devi and another Vs. Dharmendra Kumar Gupta] and AIR 2002 SC 396 [Sumita Singh Vs. Kumar Sanjay and another].

¶17

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner along with the above decisions, the petition in H.M.O.P.No. 948 of 2016 is ordered to be withdrawn from the file of the Family Court(Principal Subordinate Court) Madurai and transferred to the file of the Family Court, Dharmapuri and to be tried along with FCMC.No.44 of 2016 for joint trial. The Presiding Officer, Family Court(Principal Subordinate Court) Madurai, is directed to transmit all the records pertaining to H.M.O.P.No.948 of 2016 to the file of the Family Court, Dharmapuri, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

Accordingly, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous petition is ordered. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶19

Sd/Asst.Registrar (CS VI ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar gv To 1.The Principal Subordinate Judge, Family Court Madurai . 2.The Family Judge, Dharmapuri. +1cc to Mr.C.Munusamy, Advocate Sr. 42476

¶20

Tr.C.M.P. No.798 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.20235 of 2016 BR(CO) VR(10/07/2017)

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S. Abinaya v. N. Vinothraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Abinaya v. N. Vinothraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V. Rammohan Vs P. Sundaram

D.G. Narasimhan Vs Bhavani

S.Nadhiya Vs D.Yuvakannan

Visalakshmi Perumalsamy Vs R. Rajesh Kumar

R.Nagalakshmi Vs C.Gangadharam

A. Anil Kumar Vs v. Devi Sagampari