V. Rammohan v. P. Sundaram
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras disposed of civil revision petitions challenging a docket order that required notice in transfer O.P.s and stay applications. The court found the lower judge exercised discretion properly and dismissed the revision.
What did the court decide?
Petitioners are directed to approach the Principal District Judge, Salem, for disposal of Transfer O.P.s on merits within three months.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.06.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI
C.R.P.(PD)Nos.665 & 666 of 2017 and C.M.P.Nos.3368 & 3369 of 2017
V.Rammohan .. Petitioner in both CRPs.
Vs. 1. P.Sundaram 2. S.Selvaraj 3. S.Gunasekaran .. Respondents in both CRPs.
Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the docket order dated 17.02.2017 in I.A.Nos.44 and 46 of 2017 in Transfer O.P.Nos.45 and 46 of 2017 by the learned Principal District Judge at Salem.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramesh For Respondents : M/S.Babu Ramasamy Associates
COMMON ORDER
Civil Revision Petitions have been filed against the docket order dated 17.02.2017 in I.A.Nos.44 and 46 of 2017 in Transfer
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the high court was satisfied that the learned Principal District Judge failed to exercise his discretionary power properly.
Whether the petitioner was entitled to be granted an interim stay pending proceedings instead of the issuance of notice.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V. Rammohan
- respondent
P. Sundaram
- respondent
S. Selvaraj
- respondent
S. Gunasekaran
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court