Chinnappa Gounder, v. v.C.Ramasamy
Case brief
What is this about?
The Second Appeal filed by the appellants was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellants were called absent and no representation was made for them.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution with cost; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.02.2017
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T. RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.658 of 2011
& M.P.No.1 of 2011
1.Chinnappa Gounder 2.Nallasamy 3.Thangamuthu 4.Shanmugam ... Appellants/D1 to D4 Vs. 1.V.C.Ramasamy 2.Krishnakumar 3.Mohanasundaram ... Respondents/Plaintiff and D5 & D6 Prayer:- This Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and decree dated 19.11.2009 made in A.S.No.72 of 2008 on the file of the Additional District Court-cum-Fast Track court No.1, Erode, Erode District confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.10.2006 made in O.S.No.24 of 2000 on the file of II Additional District Munsif Court, Erode.
For Appellants : No appearance
For Respondents : Mr.N.Manokaran
J U D G M E N T
On the memo filed by the learned counsel for the appellants that he had returned the case bundle to the appellants and the appellants being called absent, Registry was directed to list the matter by printing the names of the appellants. Today, no representation has been made, in any way, for the appellants. The learned counsel for the respondents present. Appellants called absent.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Chinnappa Gounder and others
- respondent
V.C. Ramasamy and others
Coram
T. Ravindran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court