Civil Revision Petition filed for expedited disposal of a Rent Control Original Petition was dismissed. The single judge held directions were unnecessary as the matter was already at a final stage with concluded evidence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.02.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
CRP(PD)No.411 of 2017
Dr.Muthulakshmi .. Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.Prabakaran .. Respondent
Prayer : The Civil Revision Petition has been filed praying for expeditious disposal of Rent Control Original Petition filed by the petitioner in RCOP.No.1129 of 2013 pending on the file of XII Small Causes Court, Chennai within a time frame as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
For petitioner : Mr.R.Veeramani For Respondent : No appearance
ORDER
The Civil Revision Petition has been laid for giving a direction to the Rent Controller to dispose of RCOP.No.1129 of 2013 within a particular time frame.
2
Online SC 744 Gayathri Vs. M.Girish.
10.02.2017
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No adl To The XII Small Causes Court, Chennai.
3
T.RAVINDRAN, J.
adl
CRP(PD)No.411 of 2017
10.02.2017
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gayathri Vs. M. GirishReferred¶3
2016 SCC Online SC 744 Gayathri Vs. M.Girish. · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. Muthulakshmi
Mr. Prabakaran
T. Ravindran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
T. Ravindran
Parties & counsel
