Full Bench order and Justice T. Ravindran disposed of Civil Revision Petitions challenging orders rejecting an application to recall a witness for further cross-examination. The High Court found no infirmity and dismissed the petitions.
Civil Revision Petitions dismissed; consequently connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.02.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
CRP.(PD) Nos.381 & 382 of 2017 and
CMP.No.1684 of 2017
Radhakrishan .. Respondent in both CRPs.
C.R.P.(PD)No.381 of 2017 : This Civil Revision Petition has been
filed against the fair and decreetal orders dated 03.01.2017 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore passed in I.A.No.808 of 2016 in O.S.No.127 of 2014.
C.R.P.(PD)No.382 of 2017 : This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the fair and decreetal orders dated 03.01.2017 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore passed in I.A.No.809 of 2016 in O.S.No.127 of 2014.
For the Petitioners : Mr.R.Balakrishnan For the Respondent : No appearance
COMMON ORDER
2
The petitioners/defendants moved an application to re-open plaintiffs evidence and recall PW1 for further cross examination on the footing that on account of inadvertence, certain questions were omitted to be put to PW1 during the cross examination. The same was resisted by the respondent/plaintiff.
10.02.2017
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No adl To Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore
3
T.RAVINDRAN, J.
adl
CRP.(PD) Nos.381 & 382 of 2017 and CMP.No.1684 of 2017
10.02.2017
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned orders rejecting the defendants' application to recall PW1 for further cross-examination are liable to be set aside?
Whether the Trial Court found proper and valid reasons to reject the defendants' petition to reopen evidence?
Thilakam and Ors
Radhakrishan
T.Ravindran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
