V.Palanisamy v. P.Sarasal
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution after final hearing when appellants failed to appear, despite death of some parties and failure to implead legal representatives.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.07.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.BASKARAN
Second Appeal No.572 of 2011
1.V.Palanisamy
2.P.Othiappan
3.P.Mariappan .. Appellants/Plaintiffs
Vs.
1.P.Sarasal
2.P.Ramathal
3.P.Aarai
4.V.Palaniammal
5.V.Ramathal
6.Devaraj
7.Rangaraj
8.Ravichandran @ Natarajan
9.Marisamy
10.R.Raman .. Respondents/Defendants
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C.,
against the Judgment and Decree dated 17.03.2010 passed in
A.S.No.30 of 2009 on the file of 1 st Additional District Judge,
Coimbatore, confirming the judgment and decree dated 02.08.2006
passed in O.S.No.555 of 2005 on the file of 3 rd Additional
Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore.
For Appellants : No appearance
For Respondent : Mr.R.Thiyagarajan, for R-6 to R-10.
J U D G M E N T
Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellants. Even on the last occasion, on 06.07.2017, when the matter was posted and called, there was no representation for the appellants. Further, on 28.04.2017, it was represented that 2nd appellant and 1st respondent died,
Parties & counsel
- appellant
V. Palanisamy
- appellant
P. Othiappan
- appellant
P. Mariappan
- respondent
P. Sarasal
- respondent
P. Ramathal
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court